Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: cowboyway

States pass laws all the time that the fed later contradicts. 99.9% of the time, the state deems the issue of insufficient consequence to drive a break with the federal government. Occasionally an issue arises (once, so far) that the states cannot or will not compromise on. When that happens, they may choose to secede. That was what happened in the civil war. They didnt do it to prove a point, that they could secede. The did it because the issue of slavery was one on which there was no further compromise. So yes, it was fought over the right to secede but why did those Southern states secede? Slavery. You just can’t get past that part.


29 posted on 05/06/2009 11:13:12 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: pepsi_junkie
So yes, it was fought over the right to secede but why did those Southern states secede? Slavery. You just can’t get past that part.

What you don't understand is that slavery was the occasion; states rights was the cause.

Can you answer the question in my hypothetical secession case?

52 posted on 05/06/2009 12:14:29 PM PDT by cowboyway ("The beauty of the Second Amendment is you won't need it until they try to take it away"--Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson