Seeing how you twist the meaning of other words, I'm not overly concerned about your attempted insult.
This is why we cannot debate this, and why your position is of the belligerent.
You cannot debate this because you cannot come up with a coherent answer. You do believe that the remaining states have no choice. That the Constitution is a tool that the seceding states can use to beat them bloody and there is nothing that protects them. You leave me little option but to make some less than flattering conclusions about your basic sanity.
Thank you for helping me understand the psychology of a wife beater, I see little difference here.
Of course you don't see the difference because in the immortal words of Jerry Garcia, "You have two good eyes but you still don't see." The abused party in your scenario are the remaining states because they have to take on all the additional obligations that you walk away from, suffer the theft of all the federal property you can grab on your way out, and endure any and all actions you might take that could harm them in other ways. And in your odd world there is nothing they can do about it, and no protections are offered them by the Constitution. Truly bizarre.
The only insanity is to argue and each of us trying to understand the others position. I contend your position is that of the belligerent, nothing can make me "come to my senses" in that regard. Their is NOTHING any leaving state(s) could "steal" that would make me take arms against them, NOTHING.