Science does not, can not, deal with the supernatural realm. Science does not address theology. Science only makes assumptions based on observation. Period.
“Science does not, can not, deal with the supernatural realm. Science does not address theology. Science only makes assumptions based on observation. Period.”
There are no assumptions here or anywhere in your brand of science... only declarations based on incomplete data.
“Science only makes assumptions based on observation. Period.”
Has Science observed the millions of positive mutations that would be necessary to make a working eyeball? Has it observed that according to its most indulgent theories we’d still be billions of years short for the necessary time to make these theoretical mutations?
Has Science observed that all observable mutations involve a decrease in genetic information, not an increase?
I hope Science has.