I direct you to post 46. Kindly don't put words in my mouth.
I guess the North "won" but the "USA" lost
You think a Civil War is something to be won? Of course America lost; we lost 600,000 soldiers. Distrust between the North and South percolated for years afterward. The death of Abraham Lincoln, the incompetence of Andrew Johnson, and the corruption that crept into the federal government under Ulysses S. Grant's nose ruined Reconstruction as a concept, a program, and in the eyes of the public. All over a scenario that could have been peaceably settled had things been done differently in the antebellum years. But they had not been. The blow up of tensions in the Civil War was years in the making. To remove one facet of the war's origin is an impossibility, given how many decades back the roots of those facets stretch.
With friends like you who needs enemies.
???
All I ask is for no historical revisionism, please. Is that too much to ask?
What revisionism?
If it was about slavery, then the Southerners were fighting for slavery right? Making all of them evil bigots. The Yankees were fighting against slavery right? Making all of them hero's. You can't clap with one hand?
Let's make sure I have been properly trained: For the South, it wasn't about stopping a federal invasion or states rights, it was all about slavery. You said so. I have been schooled now. Thank you. You really straightened me out.
More than soldiers died, important ideas died also. The concept of a dispersed government, close to the people as possible.