[BP2]

For those not keeping track, this is the case with the AMICUS CURIAE:

http://wthrockmorton.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/joyce_anderson-amicus-final.pdf

Tied to THIS SCOTUS case: No. 08-570

Title:	Philip J. Berg, Petitioner v. Barack Obama, et al.
Docketed:	October 31, 2008
Lower Ct:	United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Case Nos.:	(08-4340)
	Rule 11

~~~Date~~~	~~~~~~~Proceedings  and  Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oct 30 2008	Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due December 1, 2008)
Oct 31 2008	Application (08A391) for an injunction pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Nov 3 2008	Supplemental brief of applicant Philip J. Berg filed.
Nov 3 2008	Application (08A391) denied by Justice Souter.
Nov 18 2008	Waiver of right of respondents Federal Election Commission, et al. to respond filed.
Dec 1 2008	Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Bill Anderson.
Dec 8 2008	Application (08A505) for an injunction pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Dec 9 2008	Application (08A505) denied by Justice Souter.
Dec 15 2008	Application (08A505) refiled and submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Dec 17 2008	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 9, 2009.
Dec 17 2008	Application (08A505) denied by Justice Kennedy.
Dec 18 2008	Application (08A505) refiled and submitted to Justice Scalia.
Dec 23 2008	Application (08A505) referred to the Court.
Dec 23 2008	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 16, 2009.
Jan 12 2009	Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Bill Anderson GRANTED.
Jan 12 2009	Petition DENIED.
Jan 21 2009	Application (08A505) denied by the Court The Petition was denied at the SCOTUS for procedural reasons. BUT, there are things happening with this, and all of Berg's cases which are very encouraging! and anyone else notice how BIDEN is with Obama for every announcement, signing, or swearing in? Hmmmm.....

[hoosiermama]

Sis has also pointed out that this didn’t happen until Hillary was sworn in.....hhhhmmmm.

[azishot]

and anyone else notice how BIDEN is with Obama for every announcement, signing, or swearing in? Hmmmm.....

***Maybe it the old “ keep your friends close and your enemies closer?” Or maybe Obama wants Biden with him so they don’t have to keep him tied to a chair with duct tape over his mouth so he doesn’t say something dumb?***

[Red Steel]

and anyone else notice how BIDEN is with Obama for every announcement, signing, or swearing in? Hmmmm.....

Yes, two of Biden's swearing ins and one of Obama's have fumbled over the word 'faithfully'.

[Red Steel]

Biden, “Gird your loins”

[April Lexington]

The Supreme Court will have to be VERY careful about the civil procedure in these cases. We are dealing with a separation of powers issue and the SCOTUS took it on the chops in Bush v. Gore. They are not eager to "de-throne" another person who "won" the popular vote (I really dislike Gore).

My guess is a lower Federal court (Article III court)will rule somewhere that Barry needs to produce proof that he is eligible to serve as POTUS for some reason or another and the SCOTUS will just let the lower court ruling stand to protect its independence and the independence of the Presidency. Maybe it will be the Third Circuit challenge. maybe some other Federal court.