[April Lexington]

The Supreme Court will have to be VERY careful about the civil procedure in these cases. We are dealing with a separation of powers issue and the SCOTUS took it on the chops in Bush v. Gore. They are not eager to "de-throne" another person who "won" the popular vote (I really dislike Gore).

My guess is a lower Federal court (Article III court)will rule somewhere that Barry needs to produce proof that he is eligible to serve as POTUS for some reason or another and the SCOTUS will just let the lower court ruling stand to protect its independence and the independence of the Presidency. Maybe it will be the Third Circuit challenge. maybe some other Federal court.

[FreeManN]

U R Wrong! As Justice Scalia said, “Gore v Bush” wasn’t even close.”

There is no comparison between We the People v Obama and Gore v Bush.

If as Justice Scalia is correct (and I certainly will not argue with a lawyer as smart as Scalia) and Gore v Bush “wasn’t even close,” then We the People v Obama is a nWe the People v Obama no brainer and BO loses BIG TIME before SCOTUS!

[FreeManN]

U R Wrong! As Justice Scalia said, “Gore v Bush” wasn’t even close.”

There is no comparison between: We the People v Obama and Gore v Bush.

If as Justice Scalia is correct (and I certainly will not argue with a lawyer as smart as Scalia) and Gore v Bush “wasn’t even close,” then We the People v Obama is a no brainer and BO loses BIG TIME before SCOTUS!

Furthermore, We the People v Obama involves simple discovery, SCOTUS will have no problem ruling against Obama.