Did I miss something. Wasn’t this person saying nice things about Berg yesterday?
Also any idea why they keep posting the same messages over and over?
“This may help — it’s hard sometimes to differentiate the 3 cases:
1) Berg vs. Obama, Third Circuit Court of Appeals No. 08 – 4340
Berg filed Brief on 1/20/09. NOTE: THIS CASE IS WHAT WE’RE TALKING ABOUT ON THIS THREAD.
2)Berg vs. Obama, U.S. District Court for the ______________
Case filed under seal on 11/07/08 – cannot be discussed
3) Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 08-cv-0225
Interpleader case by Col. Hollister against Soetoro/Obama and Biden”
1) Berg’s case is fatally flawed, will never be heard by SCOTUS.
2) This case is also fatally flawed, will never be heard by SCOTUS.
3) Berg is jumping into unknown legal loop holes here. Do NOT think SCOTUS will want to join Mr. Berg in this exercise.
I don’t know, just trying to catch up here... I am a skeptic on all sides of the issue (that’s just how I roll) but lately, I can’t seem to figure out who is really leading the charge.
It seems when it gets down to brass tacks, this all comes down to who is taking the most action and needs public support. If one camp isn’t spending anything, makes you wonder what they are doing other than paperwork. If one camp is burning through money, are they spending it well or are they taking a lot of action?