I don’t know, just trying to catch up here... I am a skeptic on all sides of the issue (that’s just how I roll) but lately, I can’t seem to figure out who is really leading the charge.
It seems when it gets down to brass tacks, this all comes down to who is taking the most action and needs public support. If one camp isn’t spending anything, makes you wonder what they are doing other than paperwork. If one camp is burning through money, are they spending it well or are they taking a lot of action?
I am a lawyer. If I need money, I advertise like berg.
If I am really desperate for money like berg I take money from anyone who is dumb enough to give me money.
Then I throw a bunch of cases against the wall of Justice desperately hoping some case, any case will stick.
That in a nutshell is Phil Berg.
BTW, how is his case against “W” for “causing 911” going?
I think __________ is freaking out with spamming this thread because Berg’s is getting very close.
Dear Leader’s “attorneys” claiming factcheck.org as some form of evidence is laughable. As one person said - they put it in the footnotes because if it was in the respsnse they might get disbarred.
They gave Berg an opening he can drive a truck through.
At what point does spamming a thread become ABUSE?
My money is still on Orly and Berg. Orly may need to be more cautious with the people she associates with.