To us non-lawyer types, this is progress, right?
Third Circuit Court of Appeals
Internal Operating Procedure 3.3
Entering Court.
The panel assembles in the robing room approximately five (5) minutes prior to the opening of court. The judges enter the courtroom from the robing room in the reverse order of precedence. The next ranking judge is stationed to the right
of the presiding judge facing the courtroom from the bench. All remain standing until the presiding judge sits.
http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/Rules/IOP-Final.pdf
I don’t understand a word of it.
Why post this if you’re unwilling to post a corresponding explanation in plain English?
‘birther’ bump
...and yea! for me for making to the thread before the trolls and BOHICA Boys Club.
Obama has given up!
Obama and the DNC filed an ENTRY OF APPEARANCE in the lower Court and a Motion to Dismiss. The lower Court GRANTED the Motion to Dismiss and Berg began his appeal process. An appeal to SCOTUS was a part of the appeal process.
SCOTUS denied Berg and GRANTED leave for the Amicus Curiae Brief which opined this case is an exceptional and unusal case; therefore, standing and jurisdiction issues must be put aside and the case must be heard.
What is so amazing is that Obama’s Presidency hangs in the balance of this appeal and he has not bothered to respond to it other than to say Berg does not have standing.
God bless those people who are working so hard to see that our Constitution is upheld and thank you to anyone not willing to give this issue a pass (A la the MSM). Anyone who marginalizes “birthers” by saying , “give it up” or “its a dead issue” should join the troll list.
Thanks for the update but before we start spreading the word since mainstream media won’t touch the subject with a 10-foot pole we need something to really occur.
Additionally, I note that there is nothing in the docket listed about any appearance for Appellee Obama? What is the significance of that in this case?
Tony Rezko may be rendering this moot.
http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/rezko/1410250,CST-NWS-rezko03.article
http://www.suntimes.com/news/watchdogs/757340,CST-NWS-watchdog24.article
02/03/2009 LETTER from Appellee Federal Election Commission, received pursuant to Clerk's Order dated 1/28/2009 informing the Court that they intend to file a formal brief, unless the Court should grant the Commission's Motion for Summary Affirmance before its formal brief is due. Certificate of Service dated 02/02/2009. (CH)