Posted on 02/03/2009 1:14:11 AM PST by rxsid
Current status of Berg's case pending in the 3rd dist. court of appeals (same case the SCOTUS denied the two emergency stay requests)
12/09/2008 Open Document ORDER (SCIRICA, Chief Judge and AMBRO, Circuit Judges) denying Appellant's Motion an Immediate Injunction to Stay the Certification of Electors, to Stay the Electoral College from Casting any Votes for Barack H. Obama on December 15, 2008, and to Stay the Counting of any votes in the House of Representatives and the Senate on January 6, 2009 Pending Resolution of Appellant's Appeal. Panel No.: ECO-16. Scirica, Authoring Judge. See Order for complete text. (CH)
12/10/2008 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (CH)
12/10/2008 Open Document BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Philip J. Berg due on or before 01/20/2009. Appendix due on or before 01/20/2009. (CH)
01/16/2009 Open Document ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Steve N. Hajjar on behalf of Appellee(s) Federal Election Commission. (SNH)
01/16/2009 Open Document Motion filed by Appellee Fed Election Comm to summarily affirm. Certificate of Service dated 01/16/2009. SEND TO MERITS PANEL.--[Edited 01/28/2009 by CH] (SNH)
01/20/2009 Open Document ELECTRONIC BRIEF with Volume I of Appendix attached on behalf of Appellant Philip J. Berg, filed. Certificate of Service dated 01/20/2009 by email. (PJB)
01/20/2009 Open Document ELECTRONIC APPENDIX on behalf of Appellant Philip J. Berg, filed. Manner of Service: electronic. Certificate of Service dated 01/20/2009. (PJB)
01/27/2009 Open Document Response filed by Appellant Philip J. Berg to Motion for summary action. Certificate of Service dated 01/26/2009. (PJB)
01/28/2009 Open Document CLERK ORDER referring Motion by Appellee Federal Election Commitee For Summary Affirmance to the merits panel. It is noted that Appellant filed his brief and appendix on January 20, 2009, counsel for Appellee Federal Election Committee, is directed to inform this office in writing within seven (7) days from the date of this order if they intend to file a brief or rely on the Motion for Summary Affirmance in lieu of a formal brief, filed. SEND TO MERITS PANEL. (CH)
02/02/2009 Open Document CLERK ORDER referring the Response of Appellant to Appellee Federal Election Committee's Motion for Summary Affirmance to the merits panel, filed. SEND TO MERITS PANEL. (CH)
And in that same frame of mind I ask again, what do you think is flawed?
Please be specific. Is it wrong defendant, wrong plaintiff, wrong burden, wrong venue? and WHY?
Although U deny being a lawyer, I don’t believe it.
Regardless, I can agree with you or disagree with you and still respect you, professionally.
When we win v BO, I’ll buy U a beer and we can exchange war stories.
I've always said I'm a lawyer. It's on my "about" page. Where did I ever deny it?
I can’t it would reveal too much re: legal strategy.
btw, just got off the phone with Orly and she is very positive about today’s developments.
I apologize for my false accusation, sir!
I apologize for my false accusation, sir!
I mean, esq.
Thanks. :-)
I can’t it would reveal too much re: legal strategy.
also I sincerely hope I am wrong about berg’s cases and he wins tomorrow so I can stop thinking about the case of BO.
LOL! ;-) Good one!
Seems like the abuse button does not work. :-(
Does anyone adminster the web site during the day?
I know if you mention that someone is an Obot you will get banned.
We all hope Berg or Orley wins.....
Bingo! We have a winner! If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck.... you get the picture. ;-)
Anyone know where the moderator is?
Looks like we have dueling trolls and maybe one put down the bottle after binging earlier today.
Why should he respond to a name that is not his?
Is it possible for someone to have somehow “stolen” FreeManN’s name? I’ve never seen him act like this before, and this spamming, the “R” and “U”s like a text messaging kid, and the insults - his posts are sounding so much like a kid.
And why would someone be SO invested in WHICH case goes furthest? We just want the issues heard - these postings of whomever this is are just so frantic, and focused on promoting one person and bashing the other. Too weird.
The continuous repeat of questionable behavior is very apparent to me. But many receive it as gospel, or they forget it happened.
I've seen other FReepers question it, so at least I know I am not the only one who knows that something is just not right.
And yes, I believe someone does moderate the site during the day.
Don't know what to tell you?
I’ve seen the behavior before. Some of it was directed at me on another thread.
Never apologizes, never explains. Just continues like it didn’t happen.
Very weird and unfortunate. I think the moderator needs to investigate. Either it was hijacked, he went off the deep end or ________ I cannot say because I might get banned.
The account should be shut down or we should get an explanation. I hope people follow up with Orly to find out who this person is and that they are harming her GOOD name with their raving.
I support Orly and Berg if they are trying to protect the Constitution, Americans and our soldiers. I get sick thinking about our “kids” (said with all respect) who are risking their lives & getting killed as we now have with the Islamo-Marixist clowns in control and they are playing “catch & release” with Gitmo Islamic terrorists.
11 former Gitmo inmates who were in rehab in Saudi Arabia escaped the other day to kill again I am sure. Sick.
Phil Berg has been there from the start. Until someone else is out there fighting the fight then we should not criticize.
Thread has been backroomed. Next step: out the door.
How about KNOCKING OFF THE CRAP ALREADY!!
He’s seriously bugging the heck out of me!!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.