Posted on 02/03/2009 1:14:11 AM PST by rxsid
Current status of Berg's case pending in the 3rd dist. court of appeals (same case the SCOTUS denied the two emergency stay requests)
12/09/2008 Open Document ORDER (SCIRICA, Chief Judge and AMBRO, Circuit Judges) denying Appellant's Motion an Immediate Injunction to Stay the Certification of Electors, to Stay the Electoral College from Casting any Votes for Barack H. Obama on December 15, 2008, and to Stay the Counting of any votes in the House of Representatives and the Senate on January 6, 2009 Pending Resolution of Appellant's Appeal. Panel No.: ECO-16. Scirica, Authoring Judge. See Order for complete text. (CH)
12/10/2008 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (CH)
12/10/2008 Open Document BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Philip J. Berg due on or before 01/20/2009. Appendix due on or before 01/20/2009. (CH)
01/16/2009 Open Document ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Steve N. Hajjar on behalf of Appellee(s) Federal Election Commission. (SNH)
01/16/2009 Open Document Motion filed by Appellee Fed Election Comm to summarily affirm. Certificate of Service dated 01/16/2009. SEND TO MERITS PANEL.--[Edited 01/28/2009 by CH] (SNH)
01/20/2009 Open Document ELECTRONIC BRIEF with Volume I of Appendix attached on behalf of Appellant Philip J. Berg, filed. Certificate of Service dated 01/20/2009 by email. (PJB)
01/20/2009 Open Document ELECTRONIC APPENDIX on behalf of Appellant Philip J. Berg, filed. Manner of Service: electronic. Certificate of Service dated 01/20/2009. (PJB)
01/27/2009 Open Document Response filed by Appellant Philip J. Berg to Motion for summary action. Certificate of Service dated 01/26/2009. (PJB)
01/28/2009 Open Document CLERK ORDER referring Motion by Appellee Federal Election Commitee For Summary Affirmance to the merits panel. It is noted that Appellant filed his brief and appendix on January 20, 2009, counsel for Appellee Federal Election Committee, is directed to inform this office in writing within seven (7) days from the date of this order if they intend to file a brief or rely on the Motion for Summary Affirmance in lieu of a formal brief, filed. SEND TO MERITS PANEL. (CH)
02/02/2009 Open Document CLERK ORDER referring the Response of Appellant to Appellee Federal Election Committee's Motion for Summary Affirmance to the merits panel, filed. SEND TO MERITS PANEL. (CH)
R U incapable on an intelligent response? y would berg’s cases worry me, fran?
Perhaps Mr. Berg would care to tell us all how he will overcome this motion?
01/26/2009 9 MOTION to Dismiss, MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by President Barack Obama and Vice President Joseph Biden by BARRY SOETORO, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Dismissing)(Bauer, Robert) (Entered: 01/26/2009)
For those WHO JUST DON’T GET IT yet another of berg’s cases is going to be dismissed.
Now read slowly, fran, and try to post an intelligent response.
Ditto!
I do not applaud lawyers like berg who make false statements about Orly and attempt to selfishly undermine cases that Orly has unselfishly brought for We the People.
berg owes Orly an apology. berg owes We the People an apology for his attempts to undermine cases unselfishly prosecuted by Orly in the best interest of our Nation.
We the People don’t need just another self-serving lawyer like berg selfishly out to make money off a National crisis.
I do not applaud lawyers like berg who make false statements about Orly and attempt to selfishly undermine cases that Orly has unselfishly brought for We the People.
berg owes Orly an apology. berg owes We the People an apology for his attempts to undermine cases unselfishly prosecuted by Orly in the best interest of our Nation.
We the People don’t need just another self-serving lawyer like berg selfishly out to make money off a National crisis.
Then when will Orly take the PayPal link off her website?
http://defendourfreedoms.org/flysheet.html
Top Ten Things That You Should Know About Barack H. Obama’s, (a/k/a Barry Soetoro) US Citizenship
Download Flysheet
For more data, see our downloads page.
Issue Reference
Issue
1. He may not be a Natural born citizen qualified to serve as President under Article II of the Constitution
He admits he was born to an American mother and a British subject, suggesting dual citizenship at best-1. If he was not born on U.S. soil, and his mother was a minor, she was ineligible to convey US citizenship-2. Under the British Nationality Act of 1948, he was born a British Citizen-3. His paternal grandmother claims to have attended his birth in Kenya-4. Kenya memorializes his place of birth-5.
Issue
2. He is a suspected illegal alien for two possible reasons
At age 3, his mother and father divorced. His mother remarried and his step-father enrolled him in school in Indonesia as “Barry Soetoro” -6.
Issue
2. He is a suspected illegal alien for two possible reasons
At age 10, after his mother’s second divorce-7, he reentered the US by casually and illegally assuming his birth name. Later still, he ran for and won elected office under his birth name without disclosing his legal name or his prior use of alternative names-8.
Issue
3. He took elected office and was admitted to the Illinois Bar under an alias
No record of any legal name change from ‘Barry Soetoro’ to ‘Barack Obama’ has ever been found.
Issue
4. He probably lost his citizenship.
An Indonesian citizen at age 6 -9, having been adopted by a national, he may be in the US illegally-10. USC §1481(a)(2) provides loss of nationality by Natural born citizens upon “taking an oath or making an affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state ... after having attained the age of eighteen years,” in violation of 8 U.S.C. §1401(a)(1). Indonesia did not allow for dual citizenship. If Obama got an Indonesian passport in 1981, when he was 20 years old, he effectively renounced any U.S. citizenship he may have had.
Issue
5. He is suspected of secretly holding a foreign passport.
When he traveled to Pakistan ‘in college’-11, Americans were not allowed into that country-12. If he traveled on an Indonesian passport in 1981 at age 20, he was and remains an Indonesian citizen.
Issue
6. He posted an illegitimate birth record to deflect questions and allegations.
The “Certification of Live Birth” shown on FightTheSmears.com is not a birth certificate, but an image of an abstract that was invalidated by alteration. As indicated on that same image, the blacked out certification number invalidates the document. Document analysis shows it to be a suspected forgery.
Issue
7. The Certification of Live Birth is a suspected forgery.
The border is one that is used in 2007 COLBs. As a security measure, Hawaii changes their borders every year. This is when the Obama campaign claims the certificate was obtained. However, the seal and signature stamp are from a 2008 COLB. As revealed by a process called edging, the Hawaiian seal and signature stamp on the back of the document are revealed to be from the wrong year. Document experts have analyzed other aspects and find forgery.
Issue
8. He refuses to release relevant records.
Since matters available in the public domain raise these issues, the burden rests on Obama/Soetoro to explain. He declines to release college applications, transcripts, his birth record, or addresses of where he has lived.
Issue
9. His selective service registration may be falsified.
A FOIA document shows a 2008 sequence number for a supposed 1980 registration, an incorrect date of signature, an obsolete postal stamp and other discrepancies. Did he register at age 18 like everyone else?-13
Issue
10. Not a single cause of action has been won by Obama on the merits.
All pending suits attempting to get Obama/Soetoro to produce simple documents have been dismissed on technical grounds such as the standing of the plaintiff. Therefore, the courts, including the Supreme Court of the United States have never ruled on the merits of his citizenship
http://defendourfreedoms.org/flysheet.html
Post Reply | Private Reply | To
you are over the top
FrMan. Your continueing posting is making this thread impossible to read....Only have a couple of minutes to freep tonight....Would you please stop. Take a break. Go play your guitar.....Thank you.
ok
Let’s debate this then.
01/26/2009 9 MOTION to Dismiss, MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by President Barack Obama and Vice President Joseph Biden by BARRY SOETORO, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Dismissing)(Bauer, Robert) (Entered: 01/26/2009)
Is berg’s instant case going to be dismissed or not.
It will be, just like all of Orly's cases.
LOL! U wish!
Same stuff, different day with you.
Always the same. Spamming, name calling, telling everyone you have inside knowledge, but nothing ever comes to pass.
(Now on cue.....call me an Obot....tell me to turn myself in to the FBI)
And before anyone tells me to “just get along”. This poster has been doing this same stuff for a while.
Everyone just needs to look back on any of these BC threads to see the truth.
I don’t know about everyone else, but I will hit “abuse” when I see the abusive name calling or the constant spam.
And will not respond to FreeManN after this reply.
He’s answering to the name: BARRY SOETORO
Has he done that before?
velveeta I didn’t know you had it in you LOL you go girl....
Remember what I told you in private days ago? I think that this one smells like the troll.
He is just anwering to the names styled in berg’s pleading.
It does not mean a thing. If berg styled the case
berg v. bo aka my favorite martian
Then bo’s lawyer would answer to my favorite martian but berg’s styling is meaningless.
For a change, I agree with FreemanN.
hoosiermama.
As U know I hold U in high regard so my argument with you is purely civil and congenial.
If berg had a chance of winning any of his cases I would be overjoyed.
But IMHO berg will lose all of them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.