Posted on 01/17/2009 1:52:28 PM PST by JoeProBono
CHAMA, NM - Several meandering V-shaped UFOs near a mountain slope here turned up on a woman's digital photos. Three photos shot with a 21 megapixel camera caught multiple crafts approaching in the first frame, one craft in frame two moving close to the ground while the others take positions in the sky, and then frame three shows all of the crafts moving out of the area.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
VERY VERY VERY INTERESTING VIDEO . . . TO ME.
I’d think it would be hard to hoax with the trees and all. And, longer than most hoaxes:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vUQIynCNYU
Still there is no photo evidence at a time when photographic technology is virtually point and shoot.
The geological evidence would be more substantial. Additionally, the lack of photographic evidence is consistent with the eyewitness reports of their state of mind. Being able to perceive, yet incapacitated to perform much more than fall to the ground with emotion.
“In my fathers house are many mansions, if this were not so I would have told you” Jesus
So it is your belief that UFO’s are related to end times in the Bible, intertesting.
Carl Jung wrote that whenever there is a major change there is an increase in sightings in the area where the change is happening.
There was a huge spike in sighting in the USSR as it was falling.
The sightings appear to move people to search out a deeper meaning in life, ie God.
People who do not believe in God constilate the God complex within themselves, ie they become God within themselves and as such the highest source of morallity.
The MAIN reason is that
GOD ALMIGHTY CONTROLS THE AFFAIRS OF MAN AND THE AFFAIRS OF THE ANGELIC HOSTS FALLEN AND LOYAL.
GOD ALMIGHTY HAS HIS TIMING for the unfolding of END TIMES events.
Satan's kingdom is somewhat chaotic (lives for, dies for, feeds on, generates, thrills in chaos) and is certainly hell-bent on DECEPTION and DESTRUCTION.
To that end, in close alliance with the Oligarchy, he would love to rush the chaos and destruction as well as various aspects of THE GREAT DECEPTION before God's time.
To some degree, the obscuring and pacing of UFO revelations and events is a hellish calculated graduated process supposedly carefully calibrated from the throne of hell.
To some degree, the demonic and fallen angel hosts are champing at the bit to hold sway and overtly, influence, manage and control the affairs of the planet.
Regardless, the full blown exposure of such things into the light of the average day and newscast will not occur unless and until GOD ALMIGHTY allows it, decrees that it is time.
It would not matter if everyone had a HIGH DEFINITION VIDEO CAM constantly running strapped to their foreheads--it would still not occur until GOD ALMIGHTY decreed it was time.
Nevertheless, there have been increasingly rapid and increasingly significant incremental exposures of more and more in this field.
Folks not realizing that are either uninformed; blunted in their capacity to evaluate such information; willfully blind; full of denial and incomprehension of such things; terminally insecure and frightened to the point of ignoring and blacking out facts about such things; egotistically perverse and arrogant to think that something that big could be going on without their brilliance apprehending it; and/or some other strange dynamic preventing understanding and comprehension.
It won't matter. At the appointed time, the revelations will be stark, dramatic and pervasive enough that the paradigm of the whole planet will have shifted in one dramatic swoop or a series of such dramatic swoops.
ONLY THOSE SECURE IN AND WALKING WITH JESUS, FATHER, SPIRIT WILL REMAIN UNSHAKEN. And even many of them will be somewhat rattled until they focus more intensely on their SOURCE AND ALL SUFFICIENCY.
You have been warned.
RUN TO THE ROCK WHILE HE MAY BE FOUND.
RUN TO THE ROCK CHRIST JESUS WHILE HE MAY BE APPREHENDED WHOLEHEARTEDLY WITHOUT CLOUDING CONFUSIONS WITHIN AND WITHOUT.
RUN TO THE ROCK BEFORE THE PERFECT STORMS AND THE PERFECT QUAKES SHAKE ALL THAT IS SHAKEABLE AROUND YOU AND WITHIN YOU.
RUN TO THE ROCK CHRIST JESUS--THE ONLY ALL SUFFICIENCY.
RUN TO THE ROCK CHRIST JESUS--THE ONLY ETERNAL LIFE.
RUN TO THE ROCK CHRIST JESUS--KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS--KING OF THE ANGEL ARMIES--AS SCRIPTURE DECLARES.
RUN TO THE ROCK AND BE AT PEACE.
RUN TO THE ROCK AND BE BLESSED.
RUN TO THE ROCK AND BE CLEANSED, EMPOWERED AND SHELTERED BY HIS BLOOD.
RUN TO THE ROCK AND BE COMFORTED.
RUN TO THE ROCK AND BE CONTINUALLY FILLED BY HIS SPIRIT.
RUN TO THE ROCK AND BE ENABLED.
RUN TO THE ROCK AND BE ENLIVENED.
RUN TO THE ROCK AND BE ESTABLISHED ON HIM.
RUN TO THE ROCK AND BE ESTABLISHED ON HIM.
RUN TO THE ROCK AND BE ETERNALLY ALIVE.
RUN TO THE ROCK AND BE FRUITFUL BY HIS SPIRIT.
RUN TO THE ROCK AND BE FULFILLED.
RUN TO THE ROCK AND BE FULL OF HIS SPIRIT.
RUN TO THE ROCK AND BE FULL OF KNOWLEDGE.
RUN TO THE ROCK AND BE FULL OF LIGHT.
RUN TO THE ROCK AND BE HEALED.
RUN TO THE ROCK AND BE NOT SHAKEN AS THE SHAKING INTENSIFIES.
RUN TO THE ROCK AND BE PROVISIONED.
RUN TO THE ROCK AND BE SAFE.
RUN TO THE ROCK AND BE SECURE.
RUN TO THE ROCK AND BE STILL AND KNOW THAT HE IS GOD--REGARDLESS OF ALL THE FALLEN ANGEL ARMIES AND REGARDLESS OF ALL ELSE.
RUN TO THE ROCK AND BE WISE.
RUN TO THE ROCK AND BE WITH DADDY.
RUN TO THE ROCK AND KNOW GOD.
RUN TO THE ROCK AND SHINE AS THE NOON-DAY SUN.
RUN TO THE ROCK AND WALK IN JOY.
Which, interestingly, is an extremely common part of the phenomenon.
Or, cameras are mysteriously forgotten and ignored within arm’s reach . . . or malfunction.
Or, distance, time of day, weather, AND/OR propulsion dynamics involving ionization of the surface air layers etc. of the craft prevent sharp focus.
Or, photos and videos are stolen out of houses, cars or brazenly demanded by mysterious ‘persons.’
INDEED!
And, therefore . . . regarding this topic?
The last line of your post does not at all sound like the New Testament, to me.
I’m not a fan of Jung. He listened to demonic spirit guides . . . at one point, he even labeled them essentially that.
Please stop pinging me.
Far too much stuff.
Thank you.
My closest friend and sister in Christ receives visions from the Lord from time to time. Well, last summer/early fall she had a vision about UFO’s. That they would come in the summer season in 2009 and that we were not to believe they came from Him, but that they were demonic. That the UFO’s would cause many to be deceived.
As you posted we MUST be focused on Christ and His kingdom, not on the affairs of this earth. We must be firmly established on the Rock.
Have removed you from the UFO PING LIST,
Leo Farnsworth;
Las Vegas Dave will remove you from the backup.
Sorry for the bother.
Blessings,
TRYING TO MAKE ME CRY LIKE A FLOOD ARE YOU?
LOL.
BLESSED BE THE NAME OF THE LORD.
I have no doubt that her dream/vision was from The Lord.
PRAISE GOD FOR HIS FAITHFULNESS.
I’ve been concerned that it was coming this summer, too. But I’d sure prefer it to be put off several years. Thankfully, God arranges things according to HIS priorities and sensibilities, not mine! LOL.
God have mercy on us.
Not sure if you are familiar with
Has the best analysis etc. of all such that I know of.
GOD BE WITH YOU AND YOURS.
PLEASE THANK YOUR FRIEND FOR SHARING THAT. It has been a big blessing in my life today.
LOL!
Please see posts #966
and 971 of this thread with prayerful discernment.
God be with you . . . and those characters you love! LOL.
I remain quite concerned that coming revelations are going to fracture those unprepared to have their world views rattled so much.
Regardless, God is going to be shaking ALL THAT IS NOT OF HIM. And that includes every preconception, fleshly notion; institutionalized bit of churchianity hogwash—WHATEVER is not of Him.
Folks clinging to junk pretending it is of Him will suffer.
Have spoken often of the socialist, Communist, globalist Oligarchy on such threads as well as others . . .
Here’s a link about such . . . in Europe . . . etc.
http://www.evilconservativeonline.com/2009/02/europeans-starting-to-wake-up-to.html
and a quote therefrom:
“In the grand abstract terms of the enlightenment, the legitimacy of government derives from the consent of the governed, and therefore no government should have the right to hand over its authority to some external body which is not democratically accountable to its own people. So when the framers of the EU arranged for the nations of Europe to do exactly that, they were repudiating the two centuries old political struggle for the rights and liberties of ordinary citizens, of government “of the people, by the people and for the people”. It has always been my view that this was a quite conscious decision by the EU founders who, in the wake of two world wars, came to believe that the infamous national crimes of the 20th century could be traced directly to the democratic revolutions of the 18th century, and that the only long-term solution to this was to replace democracy with oligarchy.”
..
US policymakers need to take a good hard look at what’s going on in Europe where they are coming dangerously close to losing their way of life to a silent invasion defined by cheap labor policies, feel-good treaties, and economic gerrymandering. With such direct and stark evidence in our faces showing where Obama’s European-style policies will lead, one has to assume that our politicians either want the same thing to happen here, or they’re completely stupid.
.
Great article from the Telegraph UK:
The peoples of Europe have finally discovered what they signed up to. I do mean “peoples” (plural) because however much political elites may deceive themselves, the populations of the member states of the EU are culturally, historically and economically separate and distinct. And a significant proportion of them are getting very, very angry.
.
What the strikers at the Lindsey oil refinery (and their brother supporters in Nottinghamshire and Kent) have discovered is the real meaning of the fine print in those treaties, and the significance of those European court judgments whose interpretation they left to EU obsessives: it is now illegal – illegal – for the government of an EU country to put the needs and concerns of its own population first. It would, for example, be against European law to do what Frank Field has sensibly suggested and reintroduce a system of “work permits” for EU nationals who wished to apply for jobs here.
.
Meanwhile, demonstrators in Paris and the recalcitrant electorate in Germany are waking up to the consequences of what two generations of European ideologues have thrust upon them: the burden not just of their own economic problems but also the obligation to accept the consequences of their neighbours’ debts and failures. Each country is true to its own history in the way it expresses its rage: in France, they take to the streets and throw things at the police, in Germany they threaten the stability of the coalition government, and here, we revive the tradition of wildcat strikes.
.
But the response from the EU political class is the same to all of these varied manifestations of resistance. Those who protest are being smeared with accusations of foolhardy protectionism or racist nationalism when they are not (not yet, anyway) guilty of either. It is not purblind nationalism, let alone racism, to resent the importation of cheap labour en masse when its conditions of employment (transport and accommodation provided, as seems to be the case at Lindsey) allow it to compete unfairly with indigenous workers. The drafting in of low-wage work gangs has always been seen as unjust: exploitative of the foreign workers, and destructive of the social cohesion of existing communities which, incidentally, is something about which the Tories say they are much exercised. So can the protesters expect their support?
.
The US had a rule during its great period of immigration in the early years of the last century, that no one could enter the country with a pre-arranged job. This was designed precisely to prevent the unfairness and disruptive effect of the wholesale import of cheap labour. An individual travelling to seek work, prepared to take his chances in fair competition with local workers is one thing: the organised recruitment of people from the poorest regions of the poorest countries in Europe in order to reduce employers’ wage costs in the more prosperous ones, is something else altogether.
.
Nor is it “protectionism” to argue that competition for employment should take place within a context of social responsibility and respect for the fabric of communities. Genuine protectionism is setting up barriers to free trade: this is what Barack Obama is doing when he forbids the importation of foreign materials such as British steel, and urges his countrymen to restrict their purchases of goods not manufactured in the US (”Buy America!”) I eagerly await the condemnation of his proposal for US economic isolationism from all those European leaders who were so anxious to see him elected.
.
Free trade in goods, as opposed to unlimited open borders for transient labour, is absolutely essential to the recovery of the global economy (and for that matter, to the relief of poverty in the developing world). I agree with those who fear that the US under President Obama may be about to do what it did under Franklin Roosevelt, whose protectionism and hard-nosed refusal to make concessions to international needs condemned the world to a depression (followed by a war). But what the British strikers are demanding is not the same at all, and if their complaints are caricatured or defamed, the price in social disorder could be hideous. It is not an exaggeration to say that this could be the moment of justifiable anger that neo-fascist agitators have been waiting to exploit.
.
The protesters are simply demanding what they thought – what all free people have been taught to think since the 18th-century enlightenment – was their birthright. That is to say, for the basic principle of modern democracy: the understanding between the state and its people that the proper function of a government is to represent the interests of those who elected it. And to be fair to both presidents, Obama and Roosevelt, this assumption is so deeply grounded in the American psyche that it is almost inconceivable for any US administration not to abide by it quite literally.
.
In the grand abstract terms of the enlightenment, the legitimacy of government derives from the consent of the governed, and therefore no government should have the right to hand over its authority to some external body which is not democratically accountable to its own people. So when the framers of the EU arranged for the nations of Europe to do exactly that, they were repudiating the two centuries old political struggle for the rights and liberties of ordinary citizens, of government “of the people, by the people and for the people”. It has always been my view that this was a quite conscious decision by the EU founders who, in the wake of two world wars, came to believe that the infamous national crimes of the 20th century could be traced directly to the democratic revolutions of the 18th century, and that the only long-term solution to this was to replace democracy with oligarchy.
.
But there it is. And here we are, with a generation of European political leaders who almost all accept the terms in which their predecessors gave away the most important principle of that great democratic pact between a free people and its government. While times were good and there was enough prosperity to keep everybody distracted and happy, the loss went almost unnoticed except by a few persistent and despairing critics. Well, not any more. The American government may be committing itself to a policy that is economically unsound and even irresponsible, but its insistence on maintaining the compact with its own voters – on putting their concerns first – will at least ensure that democracy will survive there. I am not at all sure that will be true in Europe.
Thank you for sharing your testimony!
Thank you for your kind response, caring and prayers.
LUBB
LUBB
LUBB
HUGS 2 HUBBY, TOO.
King James if memory serves me correctly.
Jung had some flaws, don’t we all, but also had some very good insights.
My understanding of demon’s, and who they serve are no doubt different then yours.
I don’t think this is the thread to debate Jung.
I don’t see Jung as a source of TRUTH, at all.
Good water does not flow from a polluted well.
Nevertheless, thanks for a kind, civil reply.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.