Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: theymakemesick

Of course, but by how much?

If Obama were born at Kapiolani Hospital, as would most likely have been the case for anyone in the University of Hawaii community in 1961, it should be failrly easy to determine the normal lag between birth and registration.

If this particular birth were to have been registered, say, a week later than normal, with no hospital indicated (home birth), and no attending physican’s signature, and AFTER Ann Dunham was repoerted to have shown up at her childhood friend’s home in Mercer Island, WA asking for instructions on diaper changing, it would very strongly indicate to me that Obama was NOT born in Hawaii.

Would it not?


267 posted on 11/15/2008 9:44:45 PM PST by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies ]


To: John Valentine
I don't know the details of the statements you mentioned so am unable to comment on them but if all of those things are true, then yes, it would seem to indicate that he was not born in Hawaii. I was just stating that a lag of several days between "birth" and "registration" would not surprise me in 1961. FWIW, Aug. 4, 1961 was a Friday and the alleged "state registration" occured the next Tuesday.

Cheers

288 posted on 11/15/2008 10:13:24 PM PST by theymakemesick (Buraq - The winged creature that carried mohammed on his Night Journey from Mecca to Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson