When an inaccuracy is posted, that does not change it into a truthful statement.
Factcheck is biased and has an agenda. They could have forged the artifacts in their photos. They could have photographed the artifacts knowing that someone forged them. They could have photographed them not knowing anything about authenticating documents.
What I point out is the evidence that they present is much more substantial than Polarik's continued attacks on low res Kos and smears scans. He needs to address the artifacts, specifically how they were made (various possibilities) and then photographed. If he continues to promote the idea that everything was photoshopped (e.g. his recent statement about how round the seal was) then I will continue to point out that his whole premise is wrong.