Free Republic Purge: Conservative Web Site Bans Giuliani Supporters

NY Observer ^ | Published: May 24, 2007 | by Rebecca Sinderbrand

[Syncro]

What the hell is The New York Observer?

Traffic Rank per Alexa.com:

Free Republic: 5,449
Lucianne.com: 46,978
Sweetness-light.com: 265,776
NYObserver.com: 348,579
DarwinCentral.org: 4,013,112
WideAwakes.net: 4,432,408
ClownPosse.org (Defunct)

I'm surprised you didn't know about the NYO

It's a lot more well known than some of your other BFF's sites.

Oh, and BTW I never saw a retraction of your lie posted here on FR about me.

[The Spirit Of Allegiance]

Good catch.

Conservative men are more likely to be chivalrous without ostentatiousness.

Conservative women are more likely to be grateful for opened doors and just generally being treated like a Lady.

That old traditional family values thing, I suppose....

Works for me.

[wardaddy]

thanks....it was a long walk..lol

[b9]

It’s kind of fun to watch the WA skirmishes,
seething under a thin veil of ‘civility’.
Same posters who left here in a huff,
still huffin & a puffin.

Shangrila NOT.

[JillValentine]

At the first Republican debate, the candidates were asked if they believed in evolution. The ones who didn't believe in evolution were asked to raise their hands. Only Brownback, Huckabee, and Tancredo raised their hands. That means 7 out of the 10 GOP candidates believe in evolution, including Duncan Hunter.

[SoCalPol]

http://www.house.gov/hunter/index.shtml

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1773726/posts?page=101,50

You may want to recheck Duncan Hunter’s sites.

Brownbeck also voted against the surge and is for amnesty.
Huckabee is no better and Tancredo only wishes he had the record Hunter has on the border issues

[elfman2]

"At the first Republican debate, the candidates were asked if they believed in evolution. The ones who didn't believe in evolution were asked to raise their hands. Only Brownback, Huckabee, and Tancredo raised their hands. That means 7 out of the 10 GOP candidates believe in evolution, including Duncan Hunter."

Good point! I think the implications go without saying.

[JillValentine]

Um, I’m for the surge, against amnesty, and believe in evolution. I was praising Hunter.

[finnigan2]

“His well-documented track record is one of hard-core, radical leftism (it’s important to note that I specifically did not say just “liberalism”) on way too many issues for him to be given any credence on a conservative website.”

- It’s truly sad. As I said in my original posting - you really have no candidate to represent your views in 2008. You are out of the mainstream. Better you stay home in 2008 and rage, rage against the dying of the light.

[SoCalPol]

Got that.

[SusaninOhio]

Ranks right up there with those ‘brave freedom fighters’ who cover up their faces with ski masks.

Bravery is not shown by hiding your face. Just a little comment to those COWARDS who hide their names, making them pathetic cowards like the sky mask gangs.

Pathetic cowards every one of them.

[bjs1779]

I haven't the foggiest idea of who you are because your moniker is a complete blank to me. Perhaps I don't breathe the same air as you.

Why don't you just try to respond to my post, gabby?

[GovernmentShrinker]

You overestimate him. He’s just another aging rich guy with a big head. And thanks to his past currency-manipulating antics, he’s got a lot of enemies in high places — more than any other aging rich guy with a big head that I can think of. If he has any succession plan at all, it will splinter quickly into lots of in-fighting factions.

[Alberta's Child]

Sorry to disappoint you, but I will never stay home in 2008. I'll write in "Ronald McDonald" if there isn't anyone on the ballot who is conservative on at least 70% of the issues, but I'll be there to vote.

You are out of the mainstream.

I probably am -- which I consider a point in my favor (see quote below). But anyone who supports Rudy Giuliani is going to be seriously disappointed when they find out how far out of the mainstream that limp-wristed, effete, lisping liberal is in this country.

"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot." -- Mark Twain

[calcowgirl]

I am not going to play with you Spiff. The outrageous lies you just said about my feelings on Ronald Reagan are disgusting. He's my hero too. Please don't post to me again if you can't be civil.

Now this is just too prescious! You are claiming to be a victim and asking others to be civil? You came on this thread and questioned my integrity, refusing to respond after multiple requests. You continued to insult others with your broad-brush slurs. You have continually whined about those who were banned for breaking the rules and refuse to respond to the matters which got them banned. And now you act as if you are a victim? Puhleeeeeeeeeeze!

Now, why don't you quit acting like a liberal troll and answer just some of the questions posed to you on this thread. Here are some:

Post #596: Again—what did I post that is not honest? Be specific and provide a link.

Post #658: Please define "kooky fringe" and identify to whom you refer.

Post #662: Do you support her posting lies about Reagan to prop up Rudy?

[balch3]

there are still some of them left. They’re at this thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1840839/posts

[dbehsman]

Show me where RadioAstronomer was warned by Jim Robinson. He was banned on that thread, and he had done nothing to deserve it.

My butt he didn't deserve it! Would you like for me to forward to you the nasty little Freeper mail that the little cretin sent to me? He asked for it, he begged for it, and FreeRepublic is a much better place without him. He was banned when he blew a head gasket on a Schiavo thread. I hope he does not come back. He can rot over at Darwiniac Central.

[RGSpincich]

O'Conner was the result of pressure to appoint the first female justice

Seems to me she was the result of a campaign promise to appoint a female to the court. Another example of political expediency like the signing of the Therapeutic Abortion Bill. Even the best get sucked into that stuff.

Reagan also promised that his next nominee after Bork would upset Bork's critics and share his views. All we got out of that was Kennedy. Who, incidently, was the subject of impeachment talk by conservatives such as Phyllis Schafly, Michael Farris and Edwin Vieria in 2005.

[j.cam]

Thanks for the information. I didn't know that.

[longshadow]

My butt he didn't deserve it! Would you like for me to forward to you the nasty little Freeper mail that the little cretin sent to me? He asked for it, he begged for it, and FreeRepublic is a much better place without him. He was banned when he blew a head gasket on a Schiavo thread. I hope he does not come back. He can rot over at Darwiniac Central.

Ooooooo; a nasty Freepmail. Boo-hoo! Did you wet yourself when you read it?

RA contributed more to the collective intelligence of this website in one week than you have in your entire existence as a member of FR.

Face it, you couldn't carry RadioAstronomer's sliderule if it was stapled to your hand.

FreeRepublic's loss is DarwinCentral.org's gain.