Posted on 05/26/2007 1:49:34 PM PDT by Eurotwit
A few weeks ago in between Hillary Clintons official entry into the presidential race and the first Republican primary debate of the cycle the fiery online conservative forum Free Republic marked a decade in operation as one of the premier online forums for right-wing political discussion.
It also experienced one of the biggest internal battles to rock the site since the 2000 election of George W. Bush -- a tumultuous campaign year that nearly tore the site apart, as its founder and chief administrator first cleansed commenting ranks of Bush supporters, then, later, rallied to his support.
At the heart of the latest controversy: the fight over the conservative bona fides of Rudy Giuliani.
Over the past few weeks, chaos has reigned in the Freeper community as members sympathetic to the former mayor's candidacy claim to have suffered banishment from the site. They were victimized, they say, by a wave of purges designed to weed out any remaining support for the Giuliani campaign on the popular conservative web forum. Another significant chunk of commenters have migrated away from the controversial site over the action, according to a number of former site members and conservative bloggers who have been tracking the situation.
In a plaintive post on the blog Sweetness & Light, exiled commenter Steve Gilbert, who says he does not support the former mayors campaign, blasted the sites new anti-Giuliani, anti-abortion jihad. Since George W. Bush was elected president, he wrote, there havent been any large scale [Free Republic] purges to speak of until now.
The fight began one month ago, when site founder Jim Robinson posted an anti-Giuliani manifesto titled: Giuliani as the GOP presidential nominee would be a dagger in the heart of the conservative movement. Then the virtual ax started to swing. Longtime posters to the freewheeling discussion threads, used to serious no-holds-barred web etiquette, were still stunned by the intensity of the anti-Rudy activity; conservative blogs buzzed with the development.
Jim Robinson has been going on a tear demonizing Rudy Giuliani, because Rudy (agreeing with the vast majority of Americans), is personally opposed to abortions on a moral level complained a user on the GOPUSA Web site. Anyone who posts any support for Giuliani at the site, if it's at all forceful, will be banned.
(Normally, we don't allow complaints about other conservative forums, chided the moderator, but because it is being discussed all over the Internet, I'll make an exception.)
Just a few months ago, Rudy Giuliani placed second in an early Free Republic straw poll; now, his support on the site has been virtually eliminated. After the April Purge, I don't think there are any Rudybots left around here, noted Free Republic commenter upchuck in one recent post. And if there are, they're not posting pro-Rudy stuff :).
The forums werent the only venue for the Free Republics new antagonism toward Mr. Giuliani, which coincided with a wave of comments expressing similar sentiments from other corners of the conservative movement. A few days after Mr. Giulianis equivocal Roe v. Wade comments at the Republican presidential debate on May 3, a new STOP RUDY NOW News & Information Thread was featured on the site, and a newly-created stand-alone category debuted via a link from the homepage: The Giuliani Truth File. (So far this campaign season, Mr. Giuliani is the only candidate Republican or Democratic to be singled out for that level of scrutiny from the Free Republic.)
Why Rudy? Why now? Some conservative bloggers and former commenters contacted for their view of the continuing controversy say they believe that site founder Jim Robinson holds ideologically middling Republicans like Mr. Giuliani responsible for the GOPs congressional loss and current woes. (They asked that their names be kept out of this story for fear of antagonizing the famously frisky site regulars.)
Others claim that the former mayors top-tier status is spurring frantic site administrators into action. Finally, one popular theory holds that the Free Republic is secretly hoping for another Clinton presidency that would send its Alexa ratings soaring back to levels it hasnt experienced since its halcyon days of the Clinton impeachment, when a since-soured relationship with blog pioneer Matt Drudge and overwhelming anti-Clinton sentiment in Republican ranks helped make Free Republic one of the hottest Web sites in the nation. It hasn't recovered that luster since the Bush administration took over.
Its not a conspiracy theory, its an observation, said one blogger, who describes himself as a half-hearted Mitt Romney supporter. Theyve still got a brand name that means something, but theyre not what they were in terms of real-world impact. A Hillary presidency would get them there.
Robinson himself could not be reached for comment, but his original post laid out his case against Mr. Giuliani a graphics-heavy presentation of some of the former mayors most damning moderate quotes in mainstream media venues, along with a color-coded report card tracking his less-than-doctrinaire positions on abortion, immigration, gays and guns.
Robinson, it should be noted, famously blasted George W. Bushs presidential candidacy back in 2000, before a dramatic late-campaign about-face that saw him emerge as one of the GOP tickets biggest supporters. But whether or not Free Republic experiences a similar election-year shift this cycle, the sites current campaign is spreading a dangerous primary-season meme of Rudy Giuliani as big-city liberal and turning one of the most influential web forums in conservatism into an exclusive gathering place for those who share that view.
I’ll most likely vote for whoever the GOP nominee is, but I won’t even rule out the Dem candidate until I know who both are. Hillary is definitely not acceptable. She’s a career criminal, in addition to espousing political viewpoints almost diametrically opposed to mine. Edwards is also out for the same reasons. Obama frankly might be harmless because he’d have little real power, so if the GOP nominee was somebody that truly horrified me, I suppose I might pinch my nose and pull the Obama lever, but I don’t see any real chance of such a horrifying GOP candidate getting the nomination. We’ll see. There may yet be more serious candidates jumping in from both parties.
Communication occurred. LOL
How do I read that chart? What is being measured on the x and y axis?
This article is ridiculous. I guess the Observer has less readers than Free Republic, so they are trying to raise their status by writing a non-event.
Yes sir, that it is!
As for Rudy, it is strange that Donald Trump is backing him 100%, and even held a big fund raiser recently.
Trump is against the war in Iraq and has called Bush more than stupid for getting us involved there. So it remains a mystery exactly WHY he would back Rudy, who claims he is strong on the WOT?
sw
But most of all they both made me think - and that is why I;m here.
How are Alexa's traffic rankings determined?
"Alexa's traffic rankings are based on the usage patterns of Alexa Toolbar users over a rolling 3 month period. A site's ranking is based on a combined measure of reach and pageviews. Reach is determined by the number of unique Alexa users who visit a site on a given day. Pageviews are the total number of Alexa user URL requests for a site. However, multiple requests for the same URL on the same day by the same user are counted as a single pageview. The site with the highest combination of users and pageviews is ranked #1."
I wasn’t aware of the Trump connection. This will be a tough fight but Rudy MUST NOT see the primaries.
So the other sites are civil we are lead to believe.
There have been some threads at the new site that are a
riot. The border & illegal threads are as slashing as the ones were here.
Also the folks who support other than Rudy who are over there have clashed with Rudybots. It didn’t take long.
Yes she was but I could only go on one or two of her threads. I have dial up. A killer thread for dial ups.
Amusing. Old news, but still amusing.
She did post a few graphics, didn't she.
I cannot imagine the cowardly Hillary Clinton as POTUS. I remember MiaT had these large graphics that sometimes slowed my computer. I don’t recall Travis. So what did they do wrong?
Understand - I have dial up DSL and it can be tough.
sw
I don’t know. I looked back over that thread a couldn’t find it. She may have got it on the other threat.
“They were victimized, they say, by a wave of purges designed to weed out any remaining support for the Giuliani campaign on the popular conservative web forum.”
Well, if they’re claiming to be “victims” now, then the correct decision has been made.
I must’ve missed all the fun. Too busy being a Productive Citizen I guess. ;)
Quiet a few. I'd try but it was horrible watching as pixel by pixel rolled down.
Well, well, well. I see that you are PROUD of your disgusting post, which I objected to a couple of weeks ago.
You have to be a liberal; you have no shame.
Sadly for you, your two targets are very happy in another place, while you are still here wallowing in your bile.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.