Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rudy and the Republican Nomination
http://www.joinrudy2008.com/News/DocumentPrint.aspx?DocumentID=19580 ^ | 2 Feb 2007 | Brent Seaborn, Strategy Director

Posted on 02/02/2007 4:47:11 PM PST by PhiKapMom

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 861-880881-900901-920 ... 1,541-1,545 next last
To: EternalVigilance
*cough*

Did you turn your head while you did that?

881 posted on 02/02/2007 10:08:44 PM PST by Petronski (Who am I and why am I here?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 874 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
At least we're not riding in a van, down by the river.

Why don't you explain what that means, since no one, including me, knows what you're talking about?

882 posted on 02/02/2007 10:08:50 PM PST by EternalVigilance (With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 878 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
You certainly are if you're backing Rudy McRomney.

That is just such a specious argument; people are NOT abandoning their morals.

You're disgusting.

883 posted on 02/02/2007 10:08:57 PM PST by Howlin (Honk if you like Fred Thompson!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 854 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
That is just such a specious argument; people are NOT abandoning their morals.

Well, you're right if they didn't have any to begin with.

884 posted on 02/02/2007 10:09:32 PM PST by EternalVigilance (With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 880 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Is it stopping partial-birth abortions though, is my point. The gruesome procedure continues, right? It wouldn't have mattered if Bush signed it or not. The only way to stop this and abortions in general is to

(A) Elect Republican Presidents who'll nominate strict constructionists to the bench and overturn Roe vs Wade * cough Rudy/Romney cough *

(B) Lobby Congress for a Constitutional Amendment banning abortion

Anything else is just grinding your tires in neutral.

885 posted on 02/02/2007 10:09:49 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Forgot your tagline? Click here to have it resent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 855 | View Replies]

To: Torie

It is a crime in many states and ought to be able to be legislated against, at the will of the people.


886 posted on 02/02/2007 10:10:00 PM PST by narses (St Thomas says "lex injusta non obligat.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 877 | View Replies]

To: dmw

Yes, we do; you.


887 posted on 02/02/2007 10:10:00 PM PST by Howlin (Honk if you like Fred Thompson!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 861 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

You are a very chatty Admin Moderator. I like it. Are you new? Most just delete from behind the curtain. Cheers.


888 posted on 02/02/2007 10:10:10 PM PST by Torie (The real facts can sometimes be inconvenient things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 875 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
You're disgusting.

It's you repeating mythological personal attacks spawned by antifreepers.

889 posted on 02/02/2007 10:10:19 PM PST by EternalVigilance (With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 883 | View Replies]

To: narses
You didn't answer my my questions; instead, you asked something completely off base and off topic.

I am not a Catholic, so I personally don't care if a candidate is divorced.

DID YOU VOTE FOR THE DIVORCED RONALD REAGAN?

Rudy's first marriage was ANNULED, BTW.

Isn't bearing false witness a SIN? You have repeated committed that SIN. Perhaps you need to get shriven.

890 posted on 02/02/2007 10:10:37 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 764 | View Replies]

To: Torie

How about abortion?


891 posted on 02/02/2007 10:10:48 PM PST by narses (St Thomas says "lex injusta non obligat.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 877 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Riiiight.



Feigned ignorance is so 20th century.


892 posted on 02/02/2007 10:11:05 PM PST by Petronski (Who am I and why am I here?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 882 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

It's their new buzzword, SoCons, for Social Conservatives; after somebody pointed out to them that the Contract with America wasn't about SOCIAL issues, they've found yet anotehr way to separte themselves from those they deem beneath them.


893 posted on 02/02/2007 10:11:20 PM PST by Howlin (Honk if you like Fred Thompson!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 864 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

"Rudy's first marriage was ANNULED, BTW."

After 12 years he 'discovered' a defect. And then there was his second and now third try. What a RINO, what a CINO!

Was Reagan a Catholic?


894 posted on 02/02/2007 10:11:54 PM PST by narses (St Thomas says "lex injusta non obligat.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 890 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

"Nobody on this here site is a liberal."

A few here on FR admitted to voting for Jim Webb, and now several here on FR are supporting liberal candidates for president, and you said, "nobody on this site is a liberal". Ha! Good one! That's really funny!!!


895 posted on 02/02/2007 10:12:04 PM PST by dmw (Aren't you glad you use common sense, don't you wish everybody did?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 867 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Is that supposed to mean something?

Does it mean something to you?

896 posted on 02/02/2007 10:12:15 PM PST by Howlin (Honk if you like Fred Thompson!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 868 | View Replies]

To: narses

Narses, I asked if in YOUR OPINION, it should be made a crime. I am well aware that many states have it as a crime on their books, all of which have now been ruled unconstitutional. I want to KNOW your opinion, because I CARE about your opinion. Best.


897 posted on 02/02/2007 10:12:17 PM PST by Torie (The real facts can sometimes be inconvenient things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 886 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Frankly, you are delusional, in the extreme and no, that isn't an opinion....it's a statement of fact based solely on your posts and your obsessive behavior.


898 posted on 02/02/2007 10:13:22 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 777 | View Replies]

To: Torie

Asked and answered. I assume english is a skill you have. Does the word "ought" not have sufficient clarity for you?


899 posted on 02/02/2007 10:13:44 PM PST by narses (St Thomas says "lex injusta non obligat.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 897 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Does it mean something to you?

It means antifreeper sewage is flowing down your pipes. That's about it. No meaning at all beyond that.

900 posted on 02/02/2007 10:13:47 PM PST by EternalVigilance (With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 896 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 861-880881-900901-920 ... 1,541-1,545 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson