Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Torie

Asked and answered. I assume english is a skill you have. Does the word "ought" not have sufficient clarity for you?


899 posted on 02/02/2007 10:13:44 PM PST by narses (St Thomas says "lex injusta non obligat.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 897 | View Replies ]


To: narses

You said the states should have the right to make sodomy a crime. I asked you whether they should exercise that right which you think they should have to actually make sodomy a crime. Is that distinction too subtle to fathom?


907 posted on 02/02/2007 10:17:12 PM PST by Torie (The real facts can sometimes be inconvenient things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 899 | View Replies ]

To: narses
After the word "ought" were the words "the right to ban," rather than just the words "to ban," so that your post would read that the states "ought to ban" sodomy. (I am assuming the term ban is the equivalent of making sodomy a crime, since of course the states will never actually succeed in baning sodomy.) The insertion of the words "the right" caused you not to be responsive.

If you are upset with Rudy because, unlike you, who favors making sodomy a crime, Rudy is against making sodomy a crime, and is thus a "sodomy legalizer," just say so. If you do not favor making sodomy a crime, than you agree with Rudy, and are a "sodomy legalizer." I hope that helps.

1,001 posted on 02/02/2007 10:50:49 PM PST by Torie (The real facts can sometimes be inconvenient things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 899 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson