To: Dominic Harr
"I have no faith in the labels that get thrown around. "Libertarian" is one of those . . . if you mean less govt, that's one thing. If you mean "Libertarian Party" with it's non-initiation of force, etc, that's another."
I wasn't throwing around labels. That came from an impartial website that checks the records on all the issues and gives ratings for anyone in elected office.
They list information on all partys.
I only posed it to you because you had said that if Rudy was for everything in the CWA except was pro-gay and anti-gun he would be classified liberal by many. I'm not sure that would be the case.
932 posted on
02/01/2007 1:18:56 PM PST by
Beagle8U
(Thompson / Hunter 2008)
To: Beagle8U
I only posed it to you because you had said that if Rudy was for everything in the CWA except was pro-gay and anti-gun he would be classified liberal by many. I'm sorry, I didn't mean you!
I meant that site, using the term 'Libertarian', I don't know what they mean by it.
And I was pointing out that the Social c's here would label such a person as a 'Liberal'. In fact, just did.
949 posted on
02/01/2007 1:31:43 PM PST by
Dominic Harr
(Conservative: The "ant", to a liberal's "grasshopper".)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson