To: Darkwolf377
"Conservative doesn't necessarily mean Religious Conservative."
I would suggest that there is a movement afoot to drive a wedge between social and economic conservatives. This effort will be detrimental to to both halves of the party and the only measurable result will be the election of liberals.
442 posted on
01/30/2007 7:30:30 PM PST by
Pietro
To: Pietro
I would suggest that there is a movement afoot to drive a wedge between social and economic conservatives. This effort will be detrimental to to both halves of the party and the only measurable result will be the election of liberals.Absolutely, and it's been going on for a while now and nowhere more noticeable than here at FR and the last election.
Social conservatives think they own the party and are putting party before country.
459 posted on
01/30/2007 7:34:37 PM PST by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
To: Pietro
I think you're 100% on target.
We have to work together for our common goals, and not be two groups--conservatives and religious conservatives--divided by the libs.
501 posted on
01/30/2007 7:47:03 PM PST by
Darkwolf377
(Republican, Bostonian, Bush supporter, atheist, pro-lifer)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson