there's plenty of scientific papers showing the facts of creation theory. You can go ahead and believe your darkside that tells you it's not a theory but it's just making you look foolish. There are plenty of reputable scientists that do good scientific research into creationism and you are aware of that. You're just trying to frame the debate excluding a theory that doesn't aggree with your belief. A theory doesn't neccessarily prove itself but leads one in the direction of the truth. So I don't understand your request to have proof? Although the amazing dna code really is proof of an author.
Nice, show me them. Show me where they were accepted by real science.
You have posted all over this thread, but have offered nothing other than your BS.
No darkside, just reason and logic that seems to fly in the face of your dogma and fables.
40% of the human genome encodes things called retroelements, which are pretty much all essentially dead viruses that have inserted themselves into our genome. <5% of the human genome encodes the proteins/miRNAs/snRNAs/etc. that form us as organisms. If the human genome, at least, is proof of an author, it's proof of an author that likes parasites a lot more than it likes us.