Yes, you did.
And what, exactly is your point?
What is wrong with Antirepublicrat's comment?
What has gotten you so upset about that?
Your citation here still mis-represented it as far as I can see, by attributing the spokesperson's comment to Antirepublicrat.
You took his comments out of context to show some obscure point about his opinion that is not clear to anyone but you.
Was not the Apple spokesperson quoted in the article as saying "Mac OS X will only run on Macs"?
Did not Antirepublicrat write his opinion of that statement? Was his opinion about what would happen, in essence, not correct?
Implying that I am somehow "reading impaired" is another form of ad hominem attack. It gets you nowhere.
The context is perfect, to support my position, as a matter of fact. The thread was entitled:
Mac OS on a Dell? Dell in favor, Apple opposed
Clearly Apple is opposed to OSX running on Dell. What is antiRepublican's SOLE comment to the thread?
His defiant proclomation that DESPITE Apple's wishes, OSX will be hacked by his Russian hacker buddies "in less than 5 minutes". Which is no surprise, he calls himself a hacker in this very thread and has already been defending the hackers since the actual crack was announced, with lies he admits to knowingly and purposefully making at that time in their defense.
Find me a quote other than this thread where he claims to support anyone's DRM such as that which protects Apple's OSX LOL. There may be one but these are the types of post of his I keep finding:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1377815/posts?page=46#46
"Too effin' bad, I'll hack the hardware so I can watch my German DVDs as much as I want to. CSS is trying to keep me from taking fair use snippets and making backups? Too effin' bad, the tools I need to exercise my rights that were made illegal under the DMCA aren't illegal in other countries, and the WWW is far-reaching."
Golden Eagle Out