Replies

but based on your history and my memory of those posts I would probably see it the same way GE does.

But you haven't read the history, so you're only guessing based on GE's lies. I am for copyright and patent, just not the abuse of copyright and patent.

People on CONSERVATIVE forums are generally pretty smart

Which is why you find yourself alone in defending GE. Ever stop to think about that?

You suffer from the samething that swordmaker suffers from...you claim one thing, but when called on it you say I Never said that exactly.

Keep trying. I've shown posts where GE flat-out lied about what I said. Where he cut off the end of posts where the latter part of those same posts makes people come to a conclusion that is the opposite of what GE claims I wrote. He takes my disdain for the term "intellectual property" to mean all patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret when my stated problem (throughout my history) is in the term itself, not what it represents.

But you haven't read the history, so you're only guessing based on GE's lies. I am for copyright and patent...

ROFL! Your history has been directly linked, as well as your posts here, a clear disdain for copyright, copyright protection like DRM, and software patents. You've only been lying for months in defense of Russian hackers who cracked Apple's DRM/copyright LMAO.

Which is why you find yourself alone in defending GE.

And the only posters with a shred of credibility have abandoned you. Even your evil twin FLAMING DEATH has returned to hades leaving you here for a spanking LOL.

I've shown posts where GE flat-out lied about what I said.

BS. Every time you try to claim I lied it's just more of your defense of illegal hacking and radical leftists, since in your mind that trumps all, when to most honest conservatives, of which you are not a member, truth does.

. . . Where he cut off the end of posts where the latter part of those same posts makes people come to a conclusion that is the opposite of what GE claims I wrote. . . .

Anti, For-Q uses the same techniques. Look at his "quotations" of what I have written in this thread alone. Look at his mis-comprehension of the nature of the "Crack-a-Mac" challenges of the past where he thinks I said he could currently win $25,000 in the past thread.

For-Q thinks his "quotations" taken out of context and misrepresentations of actual positions are proper. He has no problem insulting both you and me, thinking it somehow makes debate points. You are not going to convince him that his approach to argument would get him flunked in any debate class.

Quite frankly, I am surprised the Admin Moderators have not given him a "time out" for his behavior on this thread. They have to several other Freepers who have acted similarly in the past.