I have my proof. Where is yours to the contrary?
I know, but you just knowingly and puposefully lied claiming they "lifted it".
Trying to take me out of context yet again in order to libel me?
Notice I put "lifted" in quotes, exactly like you did. That's because I don't agree with the connotation of theft that the word "lifted" carries. Read a little further to create the context that you love to so conveniently omit, and you will see where I said that Microsoft's actions were (according to the evidence we have) completely legal.
Unlike you, I don't make up facts. In this case the invented facts would be that Microsoft and/or Spider didn't credit Berkeley in the TCP/IP stack code, which would make it copyright infringement. But the facts aren't there, so I don't claim Microsoft did anything wrong. Innocent until proven guilty, what a concept.
LOL of course you don't, as we've seen you admit to knowingly and puposefully lying for months in defense of theives, why would we be surprised you don't think "lifting" can be equated to stealing? The fact that is commonly what it means, especially in the context of transferring location from one party to the next, or the fact dictionary.com lists in its definitions of lifting "to steal or pilfer". Of course we're not surprised you refuse to accept the documented definition, as defending those who "steal or pilfer" the property of others is what you constantly do. It's obviously just another lie you're trying to perpetuate on behalf of theives, just like you've previously admitted to doing.