LOL of course you don't, as we've seen you admit to knowingly and puposefully lying for months in defense of theives, why would we be surprised you don't think "lifting" can be equated to stealing? The fact that is commonly what it means, especially in the context of transferring location from one party to the next, or the fact dictionary.com lists in its definitions of lifting "to steal or pilfer". Of course we're not surprised you refuse to accept the documented definition, as defending those who "steal or pilfer" the property of others is what you constantly do. It's obviously just another lie you're trying to perpetuate on behalf of theives, just like you've previously admitted to doing.
It appears you are being intentionally obtuse again, and again taking my words out of their context yet again. "Lifting" DOES equate to "stealing" (or in this case copyright infringement). I put it in quotes because, in the obvious context that you again ignore, I don't think Microsoft "stole" anything.