Replies

->Accusing FReeper of sending you to hacker site for updates

The FReeper you are referring to doesn't mind being referred to as a hacker, in fact his screen name is based on hacker symbology. Any links from him are obviously suspect, just because you worship foreign hackers doesn't mean the rest of us should ever trust links from them.

->Stating Stallman wants all patent laws overturned

You've never disproven this that I recall with anything other than hot air, yes we know you'll defend that radical leftists and others like him till your dying breath but show me a link to your posts where you've actually ever proven anything.

->Claiming you discovered my test of you on your own

This has been pointed out to you several times before, yet you continue to lie about it. Here's a link from October 2006 where I give links to both where you started your lie, and to the thread months later where you were still lying and I busted you on it.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1724347/posts?page=148#148

Here's a repost of that October 2006 post, where I showed where the antiRepublican started his lies defending Russian hackers, and continued them for months until I finally got bored of his BS and actually looked it up:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1724347/posts?page=148#148

Another lie, of course. Here is antiRepublicans original lie, on March 25 which he went on to perpetuate for months, which is obviously a statement and not a question:

"Our military is using open source software written by a Russian hacker to secure its networks" - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1602741/posts?page=71#71

Here he is several months later (Oct 5,) still perpetuating the lie he purposefully created months ago as part of his endless effort to defend criminal Russian hackers:

"Nmap is included in the distro, and we all know that was written by a Russian hacker." - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1710675/posts?page=229#229

He has since outright admitted to these lies, despite his attempt to now deny them, and deny the fact he admitted to them, but as you can read on this very thread he admitted "Yes, I lied" on post #87. Obviously, his lies are out of control, and anything he says must be considered untrustworthy. Something I knew all along, but now the record clearly shows, despite his new efforts to lie his way out of it.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1724347/posts?page=148#148

Wow...that reveals a lot (not that I didn't already know it about him). I can't believe even he would keep a lie going for months. Even if he did this to try and trap you...it took him several months to either admit his lie or to catch you on one thing (if he ever did). To lie for months to try and trick someone into saying something isn't an honest way to do business and personally I think you should be banned from FR for such shananigans. It's one thing to say something wrong...to lay the bait but if it's not taking up shortly you must correct the record.

Also Anti-R's refusal to admit he's wrong is proven in his post about when another Freeper corrects him...he's admits the other freeper is right, but he is too. Or he just downplays the signficance of his error.

I think I'm done wasting time with him. I'll just bookmark this http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1724347/posts?page=148#148 and refer to it whenever he posts to me and say I don't deal with confirmed liars.

The FReeper you are referring to doesn't mind being referred to as a hacker, in fact his screen name is based on hacker symbology.

You really don't know the traditional meaning of the word "hacker," do you? UNIX (the traditional UNIX you like) was built by hackers. In any case you also accused him of supporting downloading updates from unofficial sites, when his animation showed an official update -- you actually thought an update was provided at his site! Incredible.

you'll defend that radical leftists

In your link below, I actually call Stallman a bastard for wanting to control hardware with his software license, and agree that he has a "cracked" agenda. Yep, that sounds like an unequivocal defense of him.

You've never disproven this that I recall with anything other than hot air

You have to prove the claim. All you could come up with was Stallman's statements that he is against software patents. After I nailed you on this, you quietly started writing "software patents" instead of just "patents" with no retraction of your false claim.

If you think that I have to prove that he doesn't hate all patents, then your logic is flawed. The one making the claim must provide proof. Otherwise, we all need proof that you don't raid the nearby goat farm for your own sexual pleasures, or you are considered to be doing it every day.

show me a link to your posts where you've actually ever proven anything.

Check out 119 in your Linux thread. I strung you along on your "criminal" claim, and then slammed it by citing applicable federal law. You only ranted in response, providing no contrary cites or precedent. I won, and was even complimented for the elegance with which I fed you your rope.

Here's a link from October 2006 where I give links to both where you started your lie, and to the thread months later where you were still lying and I busted you on it. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1724347/posts?page=148#148

You didn't guess it on that thread, much less bust me on anything. It was just too good to be true, with a name like Fyodor.

And looking back on that thread, you might want to stop using the term "cracker," to refer to black-hats, as it was coined by Stallman himself.

The FReeper you are referring to doesn't mind being referred to as a hacker, in fact his screen name is based on hacker symbology.

I mind being referred to as a hacker when it drips with the iml;ication that by going to my site I am going to hack your box.

Any links from him are obviously suspect,

Because my screen name is n3wbi3? you have to be kidding me! I have something for you..

just because you worship foreign hackers doesn't mean the rest of us should ever trust links from them.

(a) I'm not foreign, (b) I am not a cracker I am a white hat hacker and a n3wbi3 one at that. More people on FR know who I really am and what I am all about than can be counted as having a clue who you are.