[Responsibility2nd]

Oh, I read the article. In fact I read it twice. At least.

Here is something I've read 4-5 tiems:

Mary’s pregnancy is an “in-your-face” action countering the Bush Administration’s pro-family, pro-marriage and pro-life policies.

I get this, don't you?

[Always Right]

Mary’s pregnancy is an “in-your-face” action countering the Bush Administration’s pro-family, pro-marriage and pro-life policies.

That is speculation, but having a child to promote an agenda is pretty disturbing. I really hope that is not her motivation, but we may never know.

[prous]

It looks like FReepers are now going pro-gay. Or is it just selectively pro-gay because it's Dick Cheyney's daughter? 'It's ok when this person does it, but no one else can.' Despicable. No wonder conservatives are losing. We can't even be consistent in our message.

[napscoordinator]

Mary’s pregnancy is an “in-your-face” action countering the Bush Administration’s pro-family, pro-marriage and pro-life policies.



If you truly believe this than Mary must not think things through. She should have gotten pregnant in 2004 perhaps nine months before the election and then have the blessed event happen the night before the election. If you really believe that she would consider President Bush in this decision than why would she wait until he is out the door to do this? I understand that you are having a heart attack over this and I feel for you if this is overwhelming for you, but trust me this once when I tell you that life will go on.