[Almagest]

You keep posting this on thread after thread -- even after we have showed that the claim is bogus, and that the creationists are mischaractizing it by taking the popular press accounts over the actual reports of the scientists.

Once again -- I have to show everyone the basic dishonesty of the creationist approach. Here's the article I have linked to several times, now. It tells the whole sordid story. Despicable is the word that describes the behavior of AIG in this mess:

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/dinosaur/blood.html

[tomzz]

Whoever's in charge of that talk.origins web site is a bunch of committed fanatics whose definition of "despicable" is worthless in my view. Moreover, they are just as free to sue Bill Gates, MSNBC, and the Reuters news service as the "rightwing professor" here is. I'll stick with the national news services when it's their word versus the word of a bunch of ideologues or fanatics.

[VadeRetro]

You think tomzz is bad. There was a poster once who kept posting these dumb rants about "Evolutionists and the Melon Truck," or sometimes it was dumb stuff about Native American art being dinosaurs, or stuff about reptiles deciding to evolve flight by chanting "OMMMMmmmmmmmmmmmm...," or some of the longest quote-mines you've ever seen, all on thread after thread after thread. And it didn't matter how often you rebutted this stuff. You couldn't even get him to correct the spelling.

I think it was the quote mines that got him banned one day. Well, I won't go on about the guy. He isn't here to defend himself.