[veronica]

[atomicpossum]

Michael Berger, spokesman for 911Truth.org

The current embodiment of P.T. Barnum.

[cardinal4]

"We would like to know what happened," he said. "Four-and-a-half years later, we still don't have definitive proof that a plane hit that building."

Then where did it go, you dope?

[eureka!]

Here's a sample thread from the DUmbsh*ts over there. Even some of their 1000+ post members can't believe how their hatred blinds them to what happened: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=1205964&mesg_id=1205964

[Texas_Jarhead]

Contrary to their name that organization is not about truth. They are about an agenda pursued with misinformation.

[theDentist]

most appropriate!

[Kenny Bunkport]

Some blame it on an inside job by members of the Bush administration to benefit their business interests.

This one was probably posted by Howard Dean.

[mtbopfuyn]

"We would like to know what happened," he said. "Four-and-a-half years later, we still don't have definitive proof that a plane hit that building."

Oh, he's a smart one. Actually, nothing happened. It was all faked because Cindy Lou in room #301-B wanted to repaint her office Honey Bee Yellow and somewhere within those few minutes of the first plane hitting the WTC, she came up with this elaborate scheme. There, now you know what really happened.

[LucyT]

LOL, you need to see these pictures.

[narby]

drip, drip, drip. George W. Bush is no good. George W. Bush is no good. George W. Bush is no good. Change the headlines, seem to change the subject. Abu Ghraib. European disdain. Tom Delay. Katrina. Deficits. Valerie Plame. Gas prices. Karl Rove. Death in Iraq. Angry mothers. NSA wiretaps. Drip, drip, drip, drip, drip, the lede is always the same. George W. Bush is no good. George W. Bush is no good. George W. Bush is no good. George W. Bush is no good. George W. Bush is no good. George W. Bush is no good. Forget the good news, bury the accomplishments or ignore them altogether. Drip, drip, George W. Bush is no good, George W. Bush is no good, George W. Bush is no good.

[knuthom]

If there had been a camera set up perfectly to take pictures, that would be used to promote conspiracy theories. They would say that the fact the camera was there and ready is a sign of pre-planning. You can't convince some people. They will believe whatever they want to believe.

[DesScorp]

Calls these people what they are.....nutbags.

These same people say the Holocaust and Apollo 11 never happened either.

Pure whackjobs, all of them.

[Ptarmigan]

Why don't they just lay off the crackpipe and tinfoil hat wearing.

[Nachoman]

What? I get to be first! The Joooz did it!

[Deo volente]

The plane is sitting in a hangar at Dulles.
The passengers and crew are being held in the basement of the White House, and Dick Cheney and Karl Rove take turns visiting them. If they behave themselves, they get hot chocolate and a movie.

Any more questions?

[proud_yank]

[CobaltBlue]

the video does not answer the question of how any aerial vehicle — "a 757 or a missile or a fighter equipped with a missile or a fighter alone or a blimp or a Cessna" — could make it to the "central headquarters of the greatest military power that ever existed."

Well, I guess they'd be all weirded out at how easy it used to be to get close to the White House, Congress and the Supreme Court, too.

Still not all that hard. What about the nut jobs who jump over the fence at the White House all the time?

[WestVirginiaRebel]

Feh, them and the bus they rode in on, lol!

[operation clinton cleanup]

"It doesn't clarify anything — I don't see a plane in that image," said Michael Berger, spokesman for 911Truth.org.

I never saw footage of fatman and littleboy dropping out of the belly of the B-29, but I'm pretty convinced it did happen! It's amazing that these people cant come to grips with reality just because they were not an eyewitness to the event.

[Kaslin]

[Fish_Keeper]

Something has really stirred up a moonbat resurgence lately. Today there was a guest columnist in one of the "mainstream" Seattle papers writing that 9-11 was an inside job. His main arguments: A) The hijackers either never existed or were never on those planes, and B) Something other than the two jetliners brought down the twin towers. The writer was a philosophy professor but naturally the moonbats find him completely credible on these subjects. They will use anything no matter how debunked it is to back up their whackjob beliefs.