The very point of my argument was that sexual behavior only needs to be advantageous to be sustained in the gene pool. Fertilization isn't the only way a behavior can be advantageous.
Do you even know the meaning of the word "propagate"? Try Wikipedia.
Do you even know the meaning of the word "responsive"? Try a dictionary.
The problem is that I used the word "propagate" in a fashion consistent with its dictionary definition, i.e., to engage in sexual reproduction.
You then replied that homosexual activity might help the species as a whole survive. Which is a non-sequitur, regardless of whether your statement was factually correct.
I was objecting to the change of subject.
Which is why it is so ironic that you use the word "responsive" to chide me.
For the nonce, do you have any specific evidence that homosexual behaviour does in fact help the breeding population? Peer-reviewed, well-designed studies are welcome.
Cheers!