To: mlc9852
So now they're
devolving into a
lower lifeform?
We are DEVO. D-E-V-O.
(But seriously, this just shows variation about the genetic mean, which is all that's ever been observed.)
To: mikeus_maximus
I've always thought of the left wing fringe as devolved; the RAT party seems to be devolving - its the only rational explanation for the elevation of Nancy Pelosi....
7 posted on
05/08/2006 1:27:43 PM PDT by
45Auto
(Big holes are (almost) always better.)
To: mikeus_maximus
24 posted on
05/08/2006 1:40:11 PM PDT by
evets
(God bless president George W. Bush!)
To: mikeus_maximus
We are DEVO. D-E-V-O.Did someone call?
Whip it. Whip it good!
26 posted on
05/08/2006 1:43:53 PM PDT by
OB1kNOb
(History is on the path to record that America's unprotected southern border was its Trojan horse.)
To: mikeus_maximus
Strictly speaking, Darwin did not write about a direction to evolution (better and better, for instance) but spoke only of change.
If I remember correctly it was Darwin who described the now-extinct Irish Elk, who through continued selection wound up with antlers so huge the animal could not navigate a forest.
So in Darwinian theory, if a species moved all the way to a single-cell blob from a complex finch, that would not be de-evolution, just evolution from one state to another.
41 posted on
05/08/2006 1:59:40 PM PDT by
DBrow
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson