[Last Visible Dog]

Says everything I have ever read about them.

You must be a very selective reader (see faith)

Your info is dead wrong.

Once again - says you. And once again it looks like you are wrong. Did you actually read the link you posted? It points out problems with Kettlewell's methods.

I did present evidence.

An opinion piece from talkorigns.org. Do you ever venture into the scary world of information beyond the womb of the evolution-faithful?

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"You must be a very selective reader (see faith)"

No, I actually understand what is written. The moths were only pinned down in a few pictures, and only to show the contrast between the two color varieties. That's a fact.

"And once again it looks like you are wrong. Did you actually read the link you posted? It points out problems with Kettlewell's methods."

No it didn't. It said the studies were valid.

"An opinion piece from talkorigns.org. Do you ever venture into the scary world of information beyond the womb of the evolution-faithful?"

Do you always hand-wave away evidence that goes against your insular religious views? The piece was a detailed rebuttal of the charge that the studies were faked. It provided extensive citations to back it up.

[js1138]

Do you ever venture into the scary world of information beyond the womb of the evolution-faithful?

You can't find anything wrong with the talkorigin piece and you can't admit it.

[tgambill]

:)) I love to read Carolina banjo players' posts....they are quite entertaining......can't be taken serious. B_sharps answers are educated and thought out. They make me think and are logical whether we agree or not.....but carolinabanjo player is funny....