Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: SirLinksalot
Key paragraph for your focus :

-----------------------------------

Meanwhile, Schweitzer’s research has been hijacked by “young earth” creationists, who insist that dinosaur soft tissue couldn’t possibly survive millions of years. They claim her discoveries support their belief, based on their interpretation of Genesis, that the earth is only a few thousand years old. Of course, it’s not unusual for a paleontologist to differ with creationists. But when creationists misrepresent Schweitzer’s data, she takes it personally: she describes herself as “a complete and total Christian.” On a shelf in her office is a plaque bearing an Old Testament verse: “For I know the plans I have for you,” declares the Lord, “plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future.”
2 posted on 05/01/2006 8:30:31 AM PDT by SirLinksalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SirLinksalot

>>>dinosaur soft tissue couldn’t possibly survive millions of years.

Then explain how there is a Helen Thomas.


5 posted on 05/01/2006 8:33:58 AM PDT by Son Of The Godfather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
Soft Tissues can't exist in fossils over a million years old, they should all be completely turned to rock over that period of time.

How is this explained? Is her research suspect?

7 posted on 05/01/2006 8:35:08 AM PDT by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
Missing headline:

What About Bob?


9 posted on 05/01/2006 8:39:55 AM PDT by sine_nomine (No more RINO presidents. We need another Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
Another key paragraph:

This drives Schweitzer crazy. Geologists have established that the Hell Creek Formation, where B. rex was found, is 68 million years old, and so are the bones buried in it. She’s horrified that some Christians accuse her of hiding the true meaning of her data. “They treat you really bad,” she says. “They twist your words and they manipulate your data.” For her, science and religion represent two different ways of looking at the world; invoking the hand of God to explain natural phenomena breaks the rules of science. After all, she says, what God asks is faith, not evidence. “If you have all this evidence and proof positive that God exists, you don’t need faith. I think he kind of designed it so that we’d never be able to prove his existence. And I think that’s really cool.”

Also a key quote in that paragraph.

I think a lot of YECers and IDers around here and elsewhere who seem to want to cram science and religion together into some bizarre amalgam could take a lesson from that.

16 posted on 05/01/2006 8:46:25 AM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
Meanwhile, Schweitzer’s research has been hijacked by “young earth” creationists, who insist that dinosaur soft tissue couldn’t possibly survive millions of years. They claim her discoveries support their belief, based on their interpretation of Genesis, that the earth is only a few thousand years old.

In other words, let's set aside the obvious conclusion drawn from the empirical data because we're slaves to old-earth evolution and all data must be fit into our hypothesis of origin. If it does not, it must imply that dinosaurs had magic blood vessels.
17 posted on 05/01/2006 8:46:55 AM PDT by Old_Mil (http://www.constitutionparty.org - Forging a Rebirth of Freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot

51 posted on 05/01/2006 9:14:40 AM PDT by Alouette (Psalms of the Day: 18-22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
She can't explain how soft tissue can survive millions of years. This would make more sense if the "young earth" creationist types are correct.
56 posted on 05/01/2006 9:22:02 AM PDT by manwiththehands (No, usted no puede!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot
It sure took long enough for them to write this cover-up piece. But they neglected the real 'meat' of the story. Most of the meat was outside of the bone, not inside.

No matter, truth is of no use to an evolutionist, and they even reinvent God himself around their evil belief system.

446 posted on 05/01/2006 9:11:05 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Atheist and Fool are synonyms; Evolution is where fools hide from the sunrise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SirLinksalot; All
New article on similarities between unborn human fetus' feet and fossil reptile & fish feet.

Link:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1635647/posts?page=9#9

1,661 posted on 05/20/2006 6:11:50 PM PDT by Al Simmons (Four-time Bush Voter 1994-2004!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson