To: trashcanbred
I find Darwinism to be more of a cult. No room for any arguments against it. Not that it matters really - students for the most part still believe God created us.
10 posted on
05/01/2006 8:42:59 AM PDT by
mlc9852
To: mlc9852
No room for any arguments against it. No room from arguments based on belief.
Bring data and you will be listened to.
12 posted on
05/01/2006 8:44:34 AM PDT by
Coyoteman
(Tagline change in progress!)
To: mlc9852
Funny...astrologers have the same complaint against scientists that you do... they won't debate them either. You see... scientific debate stems from some form of evidence... and while there is tons of proof for evolution, there isn't any for ID... just like astrology.
Please don't ask me for proof... just do a search on my recent posts on FR and you will see some. Like Liberals, ID'ers seem to be both phyically and intellectually lazy and I am tired of repeating myself.
Now how are you gaining scientific credence with ID? IS it through the scientific process? Nope... cause lies fall apart in front of the scientific process. So you gotta go and brainwash the unsuspecting little minds of mush (I think that is how Rush calls em). Now... THAT is a cult and you are a member of that cult. ID'ers are no different than Stalin and Mao, you are rewriting the history books to fit your agenda.
47 posted on
05/01/2006 9:12:12 AM PDT by
trashcanbred
(Anti-social and anti-socialist)
To: mlc9852
I find Darwinism to be more of a cult. No room for any arguments against it. Not that it matters really - students for the most part still believe God created us. Go read Steve Hassan's "Releasing the Bonds" or "Combatting Cult Mind Control" and then come back and tell me if it is a cult.
Then go read how science is properly practiced.
As a person who has worked a lot to free many people from cults including bible based high control groups such as the JWs, I find your comment in poor taste.
103 posted on
05/01/2006 10:18:23 AM PDT by
hawkaw
To: mlc9852
I find Darwinism to be more of a cult. No room for any arguments against it. Not that it matters really - students for the most part still believe God created us.And most people believe that God created evolution.
120 posted on
05/01/2006 10:32:10 AM PDT by
Tokra
(I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
To: mlc9852
Darwinism is more a cosmology than a science, at least for the birkenstocker wing of evolutionary theory. While I don't know enough science to take sides, the ID contingent seems far more gentlemanly than the Darwinians.
To: mlc9852
Please explain to me where Darwin and the Theory of Evolution contradict a Creator.
514 posted on
05/02/2006 7:47:24 AM PDT by
Kozak
(Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
To: mlc9852
correction:
No room for any repetitions of bogus arguments against it.
There... fixed it for you
752 posted on
05/02/2006 2:15:37 PM PDT by
King Prout
(many complain I am overly literal... this would not be a problem if fewer people were under-precise)
To: mlc9852
Yeah, but Dr. Cletus P. Yokel claims that Dinosaurs and man coexisted less than a million years ago.
944 posted on
05/02/2006 7:57:57 PM PDT by
Clemenza
(If you don't trust the government to buy your groceries, why trust it to educate your children?)
To: mlc9852
982 posted on
05/02/2006 8:46:59 PM PDT by
185JHP
( "The thing thou purposest shall come to pass: And over all thy ways the light shall shine.")
To: mlc9852
I find Darwinism to be more of a cult. No room for any arguments against it. Not that it matters really - students for the most part still believe God created us.This dogmatic inflexibility is politics. The politics of the perverts. Attacking religion which dares to criticize their deviant lifestyle is what drives the illusion of dogmatism in the sciences.
1,698 posted on
04/12/2007 7:51:32 PM PDT by
Publius6961
(MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson