[Tribune7]

For your lists :-)

[mlc9852]

Again I agree with Ann.

[Kenny Bunkport]

It's one thing for the Darwinists to doubt the creator, now they're opposed by Ann Coulter!

[wallcrawlr]

[Sam Cree]

So, does Ann say that only the Left believes in evolution, or believes it a credible theory?

[driftdiver]

Best way to get lots of angry and insulting responses on FR is to knock evolution. This should be interesting.

[BJClinton]

I may have just lost some respect for Ann but rules are rules!

[The Ghost of FReepers Past]

I will definitely purchase her new book. I have all the others, and my favorite so far is Slander, though the others are good too. Slander was just soooo funny and satisfying.

[Right Wing Professor]

Dembski wrote: I’m happy to report that I was in constant correspondence with Ann regarding her chapters on Darwinism — indeed, I take all responsibility for any errors in those chapters. :-)

Then I expect the book is particularly awful.

[gdani]

Ann should write a book exclusively on the scientific evidence for ID. It would be even thinner than her.

[nmh]

"After 150 years of dedicated searching into the fossil record, evolution’s proponents have failed utterly to substantiate its claims. And a long line of supposed evidence, from the infamous Piltdown Man to the “evolving” peppered moths of England, has been exposed as one hoax after another. Still, liberals treat those who question evolution as religious nuts and prohibit students from hearing about real science when it contradicts Darwinism. And these are the people who say they want to keep faith out of the classroom."

Evolution is the religion of the godless with NO EVIDENCE to back it up. Zilcho! Nado! Evolution is an irrational denial of reality.

[Mamzelle]

"Darwinism is bogus science." bump

[headsonpikes]

The cult of mere celebrity in the USA is a clear symptom of decadence.

Why should anyone care what this woman opines about metaphysics? There is little time enough in this mortal span to read the good stuff; why waste your hours with bosh and piffle?

Allan Bloom was, unfortunately, correct in his assessment of intellectual life in contemporary America.

All IMHO.

[Virginia-American]

Can someone post actual excerpts from Ms. Coulter's latest?

I've enjoyed her polemics in the past, but if now she's supporting anti-science or pseudo-science,

1) I'll never buy another one of her books, and

2) I'll be a lot more careful quoting from her previous ones as though she had actually researched something and knew what she was talking about.

[ml1954]

Read Later Placemarker

[Hacksaw]

Uh-Oh! Looks some some people will now be trying to get Ann banned at FreeRepublic!

[muir_redwoods]

" Coulter reveals that the so-called “gaps” in the theory of evolution are all there is — Darwinism is nothing but a gap."

That statement is total ignorant nonsense.

[x]

Coulter always gloms onto things that she thinks will win her support from the conservative base. Everything for her is a black/white good/bad issue. But plenty of Democrats do go to church, and a lot of Republicans and Libertarians don't. There are agnostic or atheistic conservatives and religious liberals. Life is complicated like that, and not everyone lives in a knee-jerk world.

What Ann's doing isn't so different from how those kids behave who'll tell you that you have to think Mumia innocent and a victim if you believe in civil rights. They don't think that people can make up their own minds about a particular controversy based on the facts at hand. Everything has to be part of one global mentality or another. It's the same way with Ann.

But Coulter sometimes has the opposite affect on people than she intends. When she jumps on board one side of a controversy, some people jump off -- not necessarily because they're liberals, but because they don't like being browbeaten into this or that position.

[Paddlefish]

Ping for later reading.

[Admin Moderator]

To whom it may concern, any more personal (bleep) and this thread gets yanked, which does not exclude other possible consequences.