To: SheLion
Liberty cannot be sacrificed in the name of public health So people with AIDS shouldn't be required to disclose with whom they have have had sex?
To: Paleo Conservative
In this case, only a charge of voluntary manslaughter is appropriate
4 posted on
04/22/2006 4:31:59 PM PDT by
xcamel
(Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
To: Paleo Conservative
So people with AIDS shouldn't be required to disclose with whom they have have had sex?There is absolutely no comparison. How can you even equate the two? You are way off base with that question.
5 posted on
04/22/2006 4:34:19 PM PDT by
SheLion
(Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
To: Paleo Conservative
Just what I was thinking. When it comes to one of the greatest killers, AIDS, the AIDS carrier **rules**.
7 posted on
04/22/2006 4:45:12 PM PDT by
69ConvertibleFirebird
(Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
To: Paleo Conservative
So people with AIDS shouldn't be required to disclose with whom they have have had sex? People with AIDS are harming other people by having sex with them. Tobacco smoke only hurts the person that's doing it (SECOND-HAND SMOKE IS A MYTH, OK?)
To: Paleo Conservative
P.C.
So people with AIDS shouldn't be required to disclose with whom they have have had sex?
S.L
There is absolutely no comparison. How can you even equate the two? You are way off base with that question.
P.C.
Must be simple.
Living life as an idiot.
9 posted on
04/22/2006 9:28:07 PM PDT by
Bogey
To: Paleo Conservative
P.C.
So people with AIDS shouldn't be required to disclose with whom they have have had sex?
S.L
There is absolutely no comparison. How can you even equate the two? You are way off base with that question.
P.C.
Must be simple.
Living life as an idiot.
10 posted on
04/22/2006 9:28:44 PM PDT by
Bogey
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson