Let's be truthful; you don't like evolutionists because we challenge your dogmatic religious beliefs. The endosymbiotic hypothesis says that prokaryotes lived symbiotically within the ancestor of single-celled eukaryotes. We know of numerous examples of prokaryotes living today within the bodies of single-celled eukaryotes. The review, if you'd read it, lists one example where an amoeba, in the laboratory, was infected by bacteria, formed an endosymbiotic association with them, and the association evolved to become obligate on the part of the amoeba. Likewise, some Paramecia have endosymbiotic green algae, and Mixotrichia paradoxa has even lost its mitochondria and replaced them with endosymbiotic bacteria. And you claim this isn't strong evidence that the endosymbiotic evolution of eukaryotes is perfectly plausible?
Endoparasitism, by the way, is often a prelude to endosymbiosis
"Endoparasitism precedes endosymbiosis"...hmm, not as catchy as "Ontogeny recapitulates philogeny".
Cheers!
Let's be truthful; you don't like evolutionists because we challenge your dogmatic religious beliefs.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I am an evolutionist, but I don't like fellow evolutionists.
Why? Because they are bullies.
They defend government schools that FORCE evolution on resistant children and demand that other tax payers pay for this forced indoctrination. They are those who are least likely to advocate vouchers or tax credits and freedom of choice in K-12 education.