Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EXXON CHAIRMAN GETS $400 MILLION RETIREMENT PACKAGE AMID SOARING GAS PRICES
ABC News via Drudge ^

Posted on 04/14/2006 1:20:10 PM PDT by aShepard

April 14, 2006— Soaring gas prices are squeezing most Americans at the pump, but at least one man isn't complaining.

Last year, Exxon made the biggest profit of any company ever, $36 billion, and its retiring chairman appears to be reaping the benefits.

Exxon is giving Lee Raymond one of the most generous retirement packages in history, nearly $400 million, including pension, stock options and other perks, such as a $1 million consulting deal, two years of home security, personal security, a car and driver, and use of a corporate jet for professional purposes.

Last November, when he was still chairman of Exxon, Raymond told Congress that gas prices were high because of global supply and demand.

"We're all in this together, everywhere in the world," he testified.

Raymond, however, was confronted with caustic complaints about his compensation.

"In 2004, Mr. Raymond, your bonus was over $3.6 million," Sen. Barbara Boxer said.

That was before new corporate documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission that revealed Raymond's retirement deal and his $51.1 million paycheck in 2005. That's equivalent to $141,000 a day, nearly $6,000 an hour. It's almost more than five times what the CEO of Chevron made.

"I think it will spark a lot of outrage," said Sarah Anderson, a fellow in the global economy program at the Institute for Policy Studies, an independent think tank. "Clearly much of his high-level pay is due to the high price of gas."

Exxon defends Raymond's compensation, pointing out that during the 12 years he ran the company, Exxon became the largest oil company in the world and that the stock price went up 500 percent.

A company spokesman said the compensation package reflected "a very long and distinguished career."

Some Exxon shareholders are now trying to pass resolutions criticizing the company's executive pay policies. The company is urging other shareholders to vote against those resolutions.


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: badtiming; bigoil; conservativenameonly; deserveseverypenny; energy; exxon; exxonmobile; gasprices; goldenparachute; hero; oil; overpaid; raymond; retirement
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 641-654 next last
To: cweese

You refuse to answer a simple question that you asked me! Amazing! You ask me details of my business relationship with Exxonmobil, and I answered with some detail! You won't answer anything at all.

Everyone else, this is how Exxonmobil acts business-wise. Rotten awful opprotunists. It's in their very CORE of business.


141 posted on 04/14/2006 2:24:13 PM PDT by ConTex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: aShepard
It is truly gluttonous.

However, with gross sales of $339.9 billion and (I assume net) profit of $36.0 billion that makes their percentage 10.59%

During Raymond's tenure the stock rose by 500% which means that a $10,000 investment during this period would have grown to $5,000,000.

Gee. There's another opportunity missed.

I'm not certain but, I believe the above profit percentage to be a gross profit figure.

142 posted on 04/14/2006 2:24:17 PM PDT by FerdieMurphy (For English, Press One. (Tookie, you won the Pulitzer and Nobel prizes. Oh, too late.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002
Damn right there a lot more going on than OPEC. We have people like this reaping profit by raping Americans pockets I know , I Know I am stupid and they have right to screw us as badly as they like , its the American way . Well: When the economy is in the toilet and people have to make a choice between gas and bread on the table you can alays say it happened because its the capitalist American way.

This is a fool's rant, plain and simple.

143 posted on 04/14/2006 2:24:53 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (Polls show Jesus' approval ratings at all time low, after a triumphant reception just a few days ago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

No offense taken. Just tell me why Exxon doesn't compete directly with Shell? That's all I want to know?

There's a Pizza Hut a few blocks from my house. There's a Papa John's three or so miles away, Pizza Hut, although much closer, still sends me coupons. Papa John's does too.

I'm sorry, I think the free market has failed here. Why don't employees rush out to clean my car and fill my tank as they did for my Dad in 1957? What's changed?

Past time for Congress to get ugly with these guys. Or have they all been bought off?


144 posted on 04/14/2006 2:24:53 PM PDT by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: aShepard

Well I guess he won't be sweating $4 a gallon gas prices.


145 posted on 04/14/2006 2:25:21 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

Political reasons, obviously. Supply and demand don't come into the issue when it comes to oil. You really think that in 5 years oil supply dropped so much? Or that demand rose that much?

Nope, it's all manipulated.


146 posted on 04/14/2006 2:25:35 PM PDT by ConTex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand
Bingo. Class warfare is a joke...so the guy got a ton of options/benefits. Donald Trump makes a ton on leveraging real estate. Oprah makes money with mindless chatter. No one seems upset.

This guy helps provide the globe with a real physical resource. And the class warfare dillweeds try to ream him a new one. Pathetic.

147 posted on 04/14/2006 2:25:41 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat ((I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
If his company had lost money and it's stock had gone down during his tenure he would have been fired.

And look how much Opry Winford is worth!

Opry certainly has a lot of people she's responsible for.

148 posted on 04/14/2006 2:26:03 PM PDT by FerdieMurphy (For English, Press One. (Tookie, you won the Pulitzer and Nobel prizes. Oh, too late.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ConTex

Have a great day!


149 posted on 04/14/2006 2:26:16 PM PDT by cweese (Hook 'em Horns!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: kjo
I told you that they DO in the last post...Geeez

Why aren't you including the competition from BP (British company)? Or Lukoil (Russian company) How about CITGO--While your at it,,,,see where CITGO gets it oil!

150 posted on 04/14/2006 2:26:38 PM PDT by stockstrader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: cweese

You too! RUN Exxonmobil SHILL!


151 posted on 04/14/2006 2:26:47 PM PDT by ConTex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader
Business is business weather it is pizza or oil.

One difference b/n Exxon and the pizza parlors is that some people can get by without eating pizza. Count me as one of those.

Certainly Exxon makes a lot of money and that is simply a return, but a CEO getting that much stinks.

Whoever said it though is right, I have as much right to criticize Exxon as does a Canadian to criticize President Bush. Anyone person taking that much $$$ is ripping off the stockholders, and that is the simple truth. One person can't even spend that much cash. If I were an Exxon stockholder, I would be unhappy over this.
152 posted on 04/14/2006 2:26:48 PM PDT by Radix (Stop domestic violence. Beat abroad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: yellowdoghunter

"I think this is outrageous! I can't believe some people actually think a person is worth this kind of money"


Of course no one is woth that kind of money. Compared to entertainers, sports stars and the like, it doesn't seem so outrageous. Exxon at least contributes something tangible to the everyday operation of the country


153 posted on 04/14/2006 2:27:13 PM PDT by Figment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: antaresequity

"Nobody was complaining in the late 80's and 90's when Exxon execs were getting hammered and loosing money"

When exactly were Exxon executives losing money? I have a hard time believing any Exxon executive wasn't being paid an adequate wage.


154 posted on 04/14/2006 2:27:27 PM PDT by cccp_hater (Just the facts please)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ConTex
I can see that facts, reason and logic don't work with someone who is likely a disgrunted, former Exxon employee...lol

Have a nice day!!!..:)

155 posted on 04/14/2006 2:27:43 PM PDT by stockstrader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: ConTex; stockstrader
Political reasons, obviously. Supply and demand don't come into the issue when it comes to oil. You really think that in 5 years oil supply dropped so much? Or that demand rose that much?

It's pretty obvious to me you don't know what you're talking about. Political reasons?!? LOL that's just RICH!!! Beyond that, it isn't that the supply is down but DEMAND is WAY up. You can't increase one part of the equation and NOT expect the other part to be impacted. You aren't looking at the situation completely but basing your opinions off of that anyway.
156 posted on 04/14/2006 2:27:44 PM PDT by MikefromOhio (aka MikeinIraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: kjo

You are right. The oil companies are not part of the free market any more than most of America's cable companies and energy providers are. These industries are essentially monopolies. No free competition exists. If anyone doubts this, tell them to go start up an oil company, or gas and electric company. They can't do it even if they have the money.


157 posted on 04/14/2006 2:27:54 PM PDT by Naptowne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: MikefromOhio

Justify the gouging and lunacy and running off of nearly 1/2 billion all you want by one guy.. It doesn't matter.


158 posted on 04/14/2006 2:29:35 PM PDT by ConTex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: kjo
I think the free market has failed here

Funny how the "free market fails" when the other guy hits it big. A sentiment straight out of Das Kapital.

The man gets paid what he gets paid and it's really no one else's business -- it's between the board and himself. The shareholders can vote by dumping the stock, if they so desire -- the free market allows for that. But why would they, when the stock has performed so well?


159 posted on 04/14/2006 2:29:38 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (Polls show Jesus' approval ratings at all time low, after a triumphant reception just a few days ago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: MikefromOhio

She's basing her opinions off of emotions.


160 posted on 04/14/2006 2:29:45 PM PDT by cweese (Hook 'em Horns!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 641-654 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson