So what are we arguing or debating about then? All I did was mention Rom 1:26-27 in regard to some earlier posts that stated homosexuality was inbred & genetic. I took exception to that and quoted Rom 1:26-27 to refute that. That's it.
What are we debating about? LOL!
At this point, we are 'debating' about the fact that you falsely accused me.
Are you going to apologize for that, or doesn't your Bible include the Ten Commandments?
I don't take too kindly to others' attributing words and positions to me that I have never said, nor taken. Especially when they say I 'railed' about them.
It's obvious that the truth is not a priority with you, but it is with me.
Our debate now centers on your mistatement of fact..........deliberate (which would be a lie), or accidental (which would be the inability or unwillingness to read). Whichever it is, you owe me an apology for it, or at least an admission that your accusation was false.
(You're a late 2004 sign-on. Many of you are trouble makers from other Internet sites which shall not be named. Is that what you're doing here? So far, I see very little to think you're a legitimate freeper).