FSF has the resources and the will to enforce the GPL and other GNU licenses, but only for software for which it owns the copyrights; GPL'd software owned by others must be defended by its owners, since the FSF has no legal standing to enforce the GPL for them.
I would have never found this w/out your help so thank you, you have provided evidence that the GPL is just a distribution license and does not grant stallman ownership of my copyright should I put it under that license
See post 44, like I said the guy must have had a change of heart, he is really speaking up in support of OSS today, really helping to debunk alot of fud..