[Fester Chugabrew]

I think I know the post to which you refer. If you care to find it and call it up I'll address as to whether it accurately reflects my understanding of objective reality. PH saw fit to put it in his list of "Brain on Creationism" quotes, IIRC. I am not at all averse to revising and restating my positions if, as posted, they were ill-written WRT my intentions. Just check the quote and make sure it says I say "Everything is supernatural."

At bottom, science is ill fit to determine whether everything is supernatural or not. Right? Or have you come across the scientific method for determining what is or is not supernatural?

[ml1954]

PH saw fit to put it in his list of "Brain on Creationism" quotes, IIRC.

No, that must be another one. I'm referring to a discussion I had with you where you stated this. If you make me dig it up and then equivocate and deny it you won't be moving up on my list of favorite people.

So why not just start with whether or not you recognize a difference between the natural and supernatural. Do you?

[jec41]

At bottom, science is ill fit to determine whether everything is supernatural or not. Right? Or have you come across the scientific method for determining what is or is not supernatural?

What is better fit than science to determine this and how would it do so? The method of science was specifically designed to determine the difference between faith and belief and fact. Before the scientific method everything was faith and belief.