State the method of science so I can know if we are speaking of the same thing.
Excuse me, but if I may Fester...just to help the discussion along...Fester argues that all is supernatural. That is, what science considers natural is supernatural.
I suspected as much. I am not interested in what Fester believes or in a opined opinion. However he is entitled to his philosophy that all is faith, belief, and opinion.
I do not argue that "all is supernatural." I argue that the distinction between natural and supernatural is scientifically arbitrary and thus not subject to scientific method.