My point is as stated: why no violent objections to "political science" and "scientific polling" (forget Chomsky), as there are here to this ID theorizing? What, which should we be fighting with such fervor? And I don't know the answer to the question in your 2nd post to me. I'm no IDer or evolutionist myself, just a kibitz.
Because the argument is that ID is a hard science, on a par with physics, biology, and so on.
Nobody's making that sort of argument for the "social sciences" (at least, not with a straight face).