Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush will win on Immigration to save the Republican Party.

Posted on 03/27/2006 9:53:41 AM PST by Pukin Dog

Just a little dose of reality for some of you going nuts over the Immigration issue, because there is NO chance that you will win on the border enforcement issue. No chance whatsoever. Only after a migrant worker program passes, making most of these illegal aliens legal, is there any chance at all to have meaningful border enforcement.

Bush is not running for office anymore, but the Republican Congress is in need of a big victory in November. This issue will kill our chances to maintain the majority, and knowing that, Bush will likely veto any bill making illegal immigration a felony, if that bill does not include the migrant worker program (call it amnesty if you want) needed to hold onto Business and Hispanic support for the Republican Party.

The Illegal Immigration Genie is out of the bottle, folks. You can’t stuff her back in without losing the House and/or Senate in November. Pragmatic minds will rule in the end, and that is a bitter pill you best swallow now.

FReepers can’t will elections for the Republican Party, but we sure can go a long way towards losing them, if we can’t put our common sense ahead of our passions on this issue. I live in San Diego County, and I see the problems with illegal immigration on a daily basis.

Whether you like it or not, much of the commerce of this country does depend on these folks to do jobs that Americans won’t do for the prevailing wage.

So, you have a choice, you can demand the border enforcement bills on their own, or you can swallow hard and consider everything you will lose if we turn off 10-15% of the electorate, in addition to the business community that depends on these workers. Yeah, they broke the law, and so do the people who hire them.

So what?

Yeah, I said it, SO WHAT? The time to be worried about that was when there were REAL Republican majorities in the Border States. It is too late now. This is a problem that cannot be solved, but only managed.

It is possible to be right and stupid at the same time. Pete Wilson tried this a few years ago, got all kinds of support for it. It passed, and Pete Wilson is gone. Then a judge overturned it anyway. That is exactly what you can expect to happen with these current bills as well. Some judge will put an injunction on enforcement, but by the time that happens, we will be knee-deep into impeachment proceeding under a Democrat Congress.

Bush won’t let that happen, neither will smarter members of the Senate and House. You won’t win, you can’t win, but you can shoot yourself and the Republican party in the head (even if you are not a member) by pursuing a program that does not include amnesty or whatever you want to call it.

We lost this one.

Get over it. There are bigger battles ahead.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 109th; 1986redux; aliencriminals; allaboutme; allaboutmeee; americahatingloser; aztlan; barfinpooch; bigzot; botzot; cheaplaborforgop; commonsense; compromiseyourvalues; domestictreason; dontposttome; egomaniacbushbot; gop; illegals; immigrantlist; immigration; letsallgiveup; mexico; mexicomergertroll; nacos; opus; poodlepoopoo; pragmatism; reallybigzot; treasonisfun; vanity; zeepoodlezinthehouse; zot; zotalert; zotme; zotwarning; zotzot; zotzotzot; zotzotzotzotzotzot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700701-711 next last
To: Pukin Dog
Best d*mn thinking on this I've seen so far.

That is a problem with us pubs - we tend to act like a dog with a bone.

Sometimes we need to remember that the mighty oak is the tree that can still be standing after the storm BECAUSE it was smart enough to bend a little.

So, folks, you want 3/4's of the pie - or demand all and lose all?

(hey, Pukin, you should copy paste this into every post on the issue - paste it over and over)

661 posted on 03/27/2006 7:48:11 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("...BUT YOU CAN'T FOOL ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markman46
how do you propose getting rid of 20 million people????, where do you hold them, how do you transport them???

exactly.

Gonna do that and get the fence up and keep any more from coming in - (a problem that has been going on for decades) before elections?

This tendency to never bend an inch is the one thing that loses us many the race. It's the same as, over and over, we put up candidates, not because they are the best or have the better chance of winning but because "it's their turn."

If we could tone down these two systemic problems in the party - we'd be so far out ahead, we'd be on our way back in

662 posted on 03/27/2006 7:57:27 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("...BUT YOU CAN'T FOOL ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Daytyn71
If a couple of Republicans lose their sets, so be it - that will be because they compromised their principles abandoning their platform and core constituency

Is it a matter of "principles" or knowing when to bend a little in order to still be in charge, to feint to the side a bit, and win the battle in the long run...

Giving up the battlefield has never been much of a strategy

663 posted on 03/27/2006 8:02:42 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("...BUT YOU CAN'T FOOL ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red
"King George" comment and sign up day 3/27/06 Hmmmmmmm Just proved Pukin Dog's point.

Yep

664 posted on 03/27/2006 8:07:00 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("...BUT YOU CAN'T FOOL ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: p23185
Better read this before you go off on another RANT

Hmmm - seems Pukin stated his premise in a reasoned, level way -

maybe you're referring to some of the answers?

665 posted on 03/27/2006 8:09:48 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("...BUT YOU CAN'T FOOL ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: zook
And one more thing. I think some people here just don't like Mexicans.

you noticed that too? ;o)

Reading through these responses, I have to keep reminding myself I haven't somehow slipped into a DU site

666 posted on 03/27/2006 8:13:50 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("...BUT YOU CAN'T FOOL ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
"Bush will likely veto any bill making illegal immigration a felony, if that bill does not include the migrant worker program (call it amnesty if you want) needed to hold onto Business and Hispanic support for the Republican Party."

It's the last straw for a party and a president who had the chance to truly make a difference for the future of America.

Instead, the bush legacy will be one of a sell out to the globalist profiteers who will gleefully continue their looting of the US economy.

Do you want to be right, or do you want to win?

Right.

There is no alternative.

667 posted on 03/27/2006 8:15:55 PM PST by WhiteGuy ("Every Generation needs a new revolution" - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cbkaty
If you do not live on the border.....or in a border state, your perspective may be skewed.

Perhaps you missed the part where Pukin wrote: "

"I live in San Diego County, and I see the problems with illegal immigration on a daily basis"

perfect example of what appears to be a lot of knee-jerk thinking going on here.

It reminds me of the actions/words of the libs that are more a result of hate driven response that clouds rational thinking

668 posted on 03/27/2006 8:20:43 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("...BUT YOU CAN'T FOOL ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

Comment #669 Removed by Moderator

To: XJarhead
Thank you XJarhead, for your post.

- it was getting mighty lonesome in here . Have to plow through a lot of threads to find the few that are being written by someone that doesn't seem to have steam coming outta their ears :o(

670 posted on 03/27/2006 8:42:45 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("...BUT YOU CAN'T FOOL ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: cvq3842
Do we hold our noses and act to keep a broad coalition together, or do we say "hell no" and stand (or, most probably, fall) on principle and educate and rebuild.

Sure hope the % of folk like you and Xjarhead and pukin are in the majority come election.

US: We stand together or we fall apart."m.t.

671 posted on 03/27/2006 8:45:36 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("...BUT YOU CAN'T FOOL ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

Together with whom? The President and his illegal-loving, Constitution-ignoring, big-spending cohorts have chosen decisively and unambiguously not to stand with me, despite my having been a solid voter and financial contributor. When I find who I get to stand together with, believe me, there will be none more loyal.


672 posted on 03/27/2006 8:47:36 PM PST by thoughtomator (Pacifism is objectively pro-terrorist; Amnesty for illegals is objectively anti-American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 669 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
Oh BS... You and your goofy ranting pal Poodle Dog can kiss Dubya's RINO @ss all you want ...You are 100% FOS

Are you trying to impress us with your intelligent, rational thinking processes?

673 posted on 03/27/2006 8:49:43 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("...BUT YOU CAN'T FOOL ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: NCSteve
If you win, but only because you have embraced something that isn't right, what have you won?

And if you shoot yourself in the foot and give the field to the enemy - thereby loosing the war...what have you won?

674 posted on 03/27/2006 8:51:11 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("...BUT YOU CAN'T FOOL ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: calex59
Dems will win this november unless we enforce existing laws and/or pass tougher ones!

Dems will win if we don't hang together - too much of this debate, even here tonight, is being decided in irrational anger which leads one to shoot themselves in the foot.

We have a much bigger problem that we will lose on, forever, if we let the dems win while we have a hissy fit.

You want us to shoot ourselves in the foot, let the libs win, let them pull out of the middle east - then get ready for a world plunged into a war like we've never seen - and we will have much of the battles nd bloodshed right here on our home-front.

We have a BIGGER enemy on the flanks right now, folks.

"US: Together we stand or we fall apart" m.t.

675 posted on 03/27/2006 9:02:22 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("...BUT YOU CAN'T FOOL ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: zook
It's always time to talk about racial prejudice in the dark holes of Free Republic.

Amen

676 posted on 03/27/2006 9:03:10 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("...BUT YOU CAN'T FOOL ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: blaquebyrd
Is it time to play the race card already?

Are you suggesting we should pretend it isn't a factor?

677 posted on 03/27/2006 9:05:53 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("...BUT YOU CAN'T FOOL ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

If you want to go the low route, shall we talk about people wanting illegals here so that they can save money on lawn care and get home construction done on the cheap, rather than hire Americans who have to pay taxes and don't live 25 to a house?

It's not racism to not want to be overrun by a foreign population and a foreign culture. If you want to prevent a productive discussion of the merits of various policies, please continue to play the race card. The reality is that legal Hispanics are first in line to want the illegals out, because they're the first to be mistaken for one.


678 posted on 03/27/2006 9:20:18 PM PST by thoughtomator (Pacifism is objectively pro-terrorist; Amnesty for illegals is objectively anti-American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 677 | View Replies]

To: sgribbley

>>Balkanization will be the norm in this country one day.<<

In California, we are already there !

A trend that was obvious since 1991 !


679 posted on 03/27/2006 10:22:07 PM PST by marc costanzo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7
And if you shoot yourself in the foot and give the field to the enemy - thereby loosing the war...what have you won?

Wrong metaphor. Yours assumes you should never have been on the battlefield in the first place. You also conveniently ignored the other part of my question. Once the Republicans have finished giving up every principle, just to save their precious "party," how will they be any different than their opposition? At that point it simply becomes a matter of which football team you like or what color shirt you wear.

Machiavellianism and triangulation are for people with weak minds and weaker character.

680 posted on 03/28/2006 5:15:25 AM PST by NCSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 674 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700701-711 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson