Oh look, tallhappy doesn't understand the difference between "evangelistic" and scientific. Talk.origins discusses the scientific evidence and research, and strives to follow scientific guidelines about how to evaluate such things. It's scientific. Since tallhappy can't find fault with their material on a scientific basis, he resorts to trying to hand-wave them away with cutesy inaccurate labels like "evangelistic".
I always find it amusing when folks who try to denigrate science do so by labeling it a "religion" in some way -- aren't they aware that they're tacitly admitting that they think there's something "inferior" about religion?
placemarker