[King Prout]

DaveLoneRanger said “Congrats, fellow higher-evolved-monkies! You and I were MEANT to abuse little children! (If evolutionists had their way)”

So to say that I said evolutionists advocate child abuse, or that child abuse should be allowed is plainly false.

Dave,
I hadn't seen this before now. Reading it now, seeing your words "if evolutionists HAD THEIR WAY", it really does look to me that you did indeed say that evolutionists advocate ("HAD THEIR WAY") child abuse.

as to exaggerated primary and secondary sex-linked morphological traits: reread what I stated - "all are THOUGHT to have evolved..." is a far cry from a statement of certainty.

ach, enough - I am beginning to suspect I mediated where mediation was undeserved.

[Elsie]

"all are THOUGHT to have evolved..." is a far cry from a statement of certainty.

It's too bad that the E side does not publish this all the time; for this is EXACTLY the solid ground upon which they stand.