[ToryHeartland]

Well, here goes another futile attempt to make the point: this article simply does not mean what you think it does.

From http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/4793198.stm, a further quote from the OCR spokesman:

"Creationism and 'intelligent design' are not regarded by OCR as scientific theories. They are beliefs that do not lie within scientific understanding."

Your labelling of the article here is about 180 degrees out -- unless the 'good idea' that can't be kept down is neo-Darwinian ToE, as taught by the GCSE curriculum

[Virginia-American]

So basically they're teaching creationism in the same syllabus as phlogiston and the four humours.