To: citizen
import poor, uneducated [and illegal] workers
A couple of days ago on his radio program, Michael Savage made reference to a report (I haven't seen it posted, nor found any other links) that GW said we will need 60 million 'immigrants' to support the Social Security program in a few years.
If that is GW's new, revised solution to Social Security, this nation is in big trouble.
20 posted on
03/04/2006 2:52:01 PM PST by
TomGuy
To: TomGuy
"A couple of days ago on his radio program, Michael Savage made reference to a report (I haven't seen it posted, nor found any other links) that GW said we will need 60 million 'immigrants' to support the Social Security program in a few years.
If that is GW's new, revised solution to Social Security, this nation is in big trouble."
SOUNDS LIKE A EUROPEAN SOLUTION, DOESN'T IT?
38 posted on
03/04/2006 3:15:59 PM PST by
BW2221
To: TomGuy
That's a part of the immigration equation for sure. A declining birthrate because the childbearers are now part of the workforce and because of widespread abortion pushes us toward the European model of economic stagnation.
If all families were good Catholics pumping out babies every two years, we would be able to better deal with the disasterous policies of becoming a nanny state at least for a while.
As it is now, our politicians, like the Euros importing ME & North Africans, want more bodies from any source no matter what the current cost.
It won't matter in the long run, our entitlement programs will swallow our economy. These low-level workers, many working for cash, can't possibly fund our socalist programs. In fact as you know, much of the illegal workforce takes more from society than it puts in so there is no gain now, much less in later generations.
40 posted on
03/04/2006 3:18:09 PM PST by
citizen
(Yo W! Read my lips: No Amnistia by any name! And the White House has a fence around it!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson