Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush: Outsourcing painful, but remedy is worse
CNN.com ^ | Friday, March 3, 2006 Posted: 1640 GMT (0040 HKT)

Posted on 03/04/2006 2:25:11 PM PST by Gengis Khan

NEW DELHI, India (CNN) -- Praising India's expanding economy, President Bush warned Friday that fears about job outsourcing to other nations should not prompt the United States to limit global trade. "It's ... important to remember that when someone loses a job it's an incredibly difficult period for the worker and their families," Bush said in a speech in New Delhi. "It's true that some Americans have lost jobs when their companies move their operations overseas," he said. "Some people believe the answer to this problem is to wall off our economy from the world through protectionist policies. I strongly disagree."

(Excerpt) Read more at edition.cnn.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: bush; gwot; india; indiavisit; jihad; outsourcing; pakistan; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 341-342 next last
To: willstayfree
Teaching engineering and working for a corporation as an engineer are two different things.

Of course. I have done both, and I am well aware of the difference. But as an engineering professor, I am also well aware of trends in enrollment and in hiring.

What you see are companies hiring new engineers right out of school because although, they will initially be an apprentice, their salaries are much lower than the senior engineers who have 10 years of experience or more.

The conventional wisdom has always been that companies lose money on the young engineers. You seem to be saying that a new hire can replace an experienced engineer. I doubt that.

Take a look at how many engineers there are over fifty. Their numbers are low because their salaries are high and companies look for younger engineers, outsourced engineers or insourced engineers to replace them to save money.

Can you provide me some reliable numbers to support your assertion?

61 posted on 03/04/2006 3:45:06 PM PST by Logophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

"But Americans never backed down from competition, and they won't back down now. And we know that messing with the invisible hand always leads to disastrous results."

SOUNDS LIKE A FOOTBALL PRE-GAME PEP TALK


62 posted on 03/04/2006 3:46:13 PM PST by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

Comment #63 Removed by Moderator

To: dfwgator
Now the world starts to wake up and get that capitalism is indeed the way to go.

The flaw in your argument is that most of the world is STILL engaged in socialism, communism and totalitarianism. The difference is that "free trade" is making THEM wealthy, not US.
64 posted on 03/04/2006 3:50:28 PM PST by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: willstayfree

What's to prove? Competition is competition.


65 posted on 03/04/2006 3:50:30 PM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: brainstem223

Oh I agree. But that is not the fault of outsourcing per se. If we are smart we will stop taxing ourselves out of the markets we are trying to compete in.


66 posted on 03/04/2006 3:51:25 PM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

Comment #67 Removed by Moderator

To: ScreamingFist

Last Chance. If you continue to annoy everyone on the board with your current freak show, someone is going to ZOT you. I suggest you Freep Mail me and we will continue this man to man. What are your AFRAID of?


68 posted on 03/04/2006 3:52:18 PM PST by MNJohnnie ("Good men don't wait for the polls. They stand on principle and fight."-Soul Seeker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: CheezyD
The US government doesn't owe you a job.

However the US government has a DUTY to protect his rights. The government created outsourcing and offshoring to redistribute US wealth around the world. In doing so it has violated the rights of American citizens by forcing INDIVIDUALS to take the financial hit for their globalist goals. That my friend is a complete corruption of our government.
69 posted on 03/04/2006 3:54:06 PM PST by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Thorin

Just wait until they outsource our own government to the UN...

At least when that happens, Bush's comments will ring more clearly...


Gold and Gun Powder...can't have enough of either...keep your o-rings lubed...


70 posted on 03/04/2006 3:54:10 PM PST by antaresequity (PUSH 1 FOR ENGLISH, PUSH 2 TO BE DEPORTED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: citizen

Of course I have heard of reverse engineering that is why we have have kept our design in house.

We are constantly improving upon it and adding more patents to it. Yes it will be copied regardless of where it is manufactured but if you still have your design team then you can stay ahead of the game.


71 posted on 03/04/2006 3:56:16 PM PST by snugs (An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Competition is competition.

There is no competition in "free trade". The system is designed to privilege "least developed countries". The system provides money from US taxpayers so "least developed countries" can set up business and compete against Americans.
72 posted on 03/04/2006 3:57:54 PM PST by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

How so?


73 posted on 03/04/2006 4:00:09 PM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: willstayfree
My experience in Britain is the reverse there are more engineers certainly in mechanical engineering over 50 than under.

We have a problem with the younger end because they fear that there will not be enough positions to go around with manufacturing going abroad.

That is why I applaud my company it has sent the manufacture abroad but kept the engineering design staff which is vital in the long term.
74 posted on 03/04/2006 4:00:40 PM PST by snugs (An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: willstayfree

Can you


75 posted on 03/04/2006 4:01:21 PM PST by snugs (An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ScreamingFist

Nonsense. I have asked you nicely to take this out to Freeper Mail. You seem bound and determine to get earn a ZOT.


76 posted on 03/04/2006 4:02:38 PM PST by MNJohnnie ("Good men don't wait for the polls. They stand on principle and fight."-Soul Seeker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
That's right. The FACTS don't matter.

This is in response to your post #25. I have read your preceding posts and have found you are long on bashing and calling people ignorant...demanding the production of facts....yet supplying none of your own.

The only fact apparent from your posting is you have none of your own.

Take a hint from Chief Justice Roberts...gather all the facts, listen to all of the arguments, then formulate an opinion. Once that is done...make your argument in support of your opinion while reciting your facts.

77 posted on 03/04/2006 4:02:44 PM PST by antaresequity (PUSH 1 FOR ENGLISH, PUSH 2 TO BE DEPORTED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Logophile
Yes the majority of work in our Chinese factory is for the Chinese market.

We do import part manufactured items for final assembly at our works and some smaller finished machines. The main saving as you say is labour costs, raw materials are not a lot different and wages are fast catching up.

Also goods are no longer duty free from China I believe because of the agreement for them to join the WTO we now have to pay duty on all Chinese goods coming into Britain.

78 posted on 03/04/2006 4:09:42 PM PST by snugs (An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: brainstem223
And what was the product they were making or you prefer to be as vague as was your point>?

I prefer not to identify the company or its product.

My point—or rather points—should have been obvious, but I will spell them out for you:

1. The old ways of doing things will not suffice. The grimy, polluting, unionized industrial behemoths of the past are disappearing.

2. Automation has been replacing labor in manufacturing for many years. The hand-wringing about outsourcing is not always warranted. Many manufacturing jobs aren't being exported; they are being eliminated entirely by machines.

3. The plant relied on imported equipment, and would be harmed by restrictions on foreign imports.

4. Quality is what counts. American manufacturers can and do compete with low-wage competitors by being obsessive about quality.

79 posted on 03/04/2006 4:10:20 PM PST by Logophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

Free trade helps when you export as well as import.

Because of free trade agreements such as NAFTA, I can now send goods to Mexico which will be duty free.

It works both ways.


80 posted on 03/04/2006 4:12:40 PM PST by snugs (An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 341-342 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson