To: Bahbah
<> We all know this. The issue is the potential for infiltration by Al Qaeda and their sympathizers. Would you have pedophile babysit your child??
To: Courdeleon02
Would you have pedophile babysit your child??
Much less an UAE islamofascist pedophile?
408 posted on
02/21/2006 1:11:16 PM PST by
Tulsa Ramjet
("If not now, when")
To: Courdeleon02
The issue is the potential for infiltration by Al Qaeda and their sympathizers.I don't see how the potential for that changes. I think it's always there.
421 posted on
02/21/2006 1:12:10 PM PST by
Bahbah
(An admitted Snow Flake and a member of Sam's Club)
To: Courdeleon02
The issue is the potential for infiltration by Al Qaeda and their sympathizers. Would you have pedophile babysit your child??little more than unadulterated BS!
432 posted on
02/21/2006 1:13:18 PM PST by
CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
(Toon Town, Iran...........where reality is the real fantasy.)
To: Courdeleon02
We all know this. The issue is the potential for infiltration by Al Qaeda and their sympathizers. That potential is always there, no matter which company is running the ports. The UAE company said they are NOT going to be in charge of securing the ports, which is obvious because no company would be. That job is delegated to DHS.
2,215 posted on
02/21/2006 9:11:23 PM PST by
BigSkyFreeper
(Proud to be a cotton-pickin' Republican on the GOP Plantation)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson